LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Conservation key to reducing greenhouse gases 

Credit:  www.thetranscript.com 26 May 2011 ~~

Regarding David Cash’s visit to the Berkshires promoting the governor’s plan to reduce greenhouse gases by 25 percent ( “Green plan is a boost”, May 24) he is certainly on track about the role conservation should play in both boosting economic activity and addressing climate woes.

The article, unfortunately, advances the misplaced notion that wind power in the Berkshires will somehow contribute significantly to this effort.

Only 7 percent of the 25 percent reduction is greenhouse gases is slated to be achieved with renewable energy. Of that 7 percent, only 2 percent is planned to be from renewables generated in state. This includes solar, biomass, hydro, and offshore wind, as well as onshore wind. All “technically feasible” land based wind sites that the wind siting bill addresses, if entirely developed, would reduce GHG emissions by 2 3 of 1 percent.

Even this, as it turns out, is a wildly optimistic figure as it ignores many factors such as the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing and installing 50 miles of ridgeline wind plants that would be required to meet this goal. By comparison, we could offset this much CO2 emissions simply by eliminating under-inflated tires in this state.

Given that we have limited resources and need to act quickly it is imperative that we focus on cost-effective means of abating climate change.

A recent report issued by EOEEA addresses this topic in depth. It reveals wind power is
does not meet this test. A wide variety of conservation oriented measures, do, however.

It is good to see state officials promoting them.

Lloyd Crawford

Hawley

May 25

Source:  www.thetranscript.com 26 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky