[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Motion to dismiss ARC turbine case is rejected 

Credit:  By Nicole Muller, The Register, www.wickedlocal.com 19 May 2011 ~~


A motion to dismiss Aquacultural Research Corporation’s appeal of the Old King’s Highway Regional Historic District’s denial of a 600 kW wind turbine project adjacent to Chapin Beach in Dennis was dismissed Thursday afternoon.

Orleans District Court Judge Brian Merrick summarily rejected OKH Attorney Leslie Ann Morse’s motion but agreed that she could re-submit the request.

Speaking on behalf of ARC, Attorney John Kenney said his client “will raise the issue of jurisdiction” at a pre-trial hearing set for 2 p.m. on Thursday, Oct. 6. ARC claims that Rose Marie Austin of Dennis had no right to appeal the Dennis Old King’s Highway Committee’s approval of the project.

Last summer, ARC brought its request to construct a 243-foot turbine on its property to the local Old King’s Highway Committee. Following several hours of testimony and a site visit, the committee granted a certificate of appropriateness. Austin appealed the decision, claiming that the local decision was a “misinterpretation” of the [Old King’s Highway Act] regarding the turbine’s size “in relation to the surrounding pristine historic area.”

The Act requires officials to consider the appropriateness of renewable energy on a case by case basis.

ARC President Gail Hart, who was not in court Thursday, has maintained that Austin is not an abutter, but Hart was not surprised by Austin’s appeal.

Source:  By Nicole Muller, The Register, www.wickedlocal.com 19 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon