[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

RAF attack plan for wind turbine scheme at East Heslerton, Malton 

Credit:  Gazette & Herald, www.gazetteherald.co.uk 18 May 2011 ~~

A plan to create a wind farm on the picturesque Yorkshire Wolds has been given a broadside by the Ministry of Defence, English Heritage and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, which is urging it to be called in for a decision by the Government.

RWE npower renewables wants to put up 10 turbines, each measuring 126 metres to the blade tips, near the village of East Heslerton, Malton, which it says will provide electricity for to up to 14,500 homes.

But the MoD says it will create “unaccepable interference” to the radar at RAF Linton-on-Ouse, near Easingwold.

Richard Maisey, safeguarding assistant for wind energy at the ministry, warned Ryedale District Council – which will make a decision on the scheme – that the turbines could result in “mid-identification or mis-location of aircraft”.

“This would have potential flight safety implications,” he said.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has also criticised the development.

Its North Yorkshire Ryedale branch said: “The developers could hardly have chosen a site with a more negative impact on the landscape if that had been their intention.”

Spokeswoman Janet Sanderson said: “The turbines will be visible from the top of Rosedale, from Ravenscar and Flamborough Head and from a large area of the Wolds in the East Riding, as well as from much of Ryedale and the southern area of Scarborough district.

“The northern escarpment of the Wolds, on which the turbines will be sited, is a landscape feature of major regional importance.”

The Yorkshire Wolds required special protection, she said.

“CPRE is not opposed to on-shore wind development and accepts that a considerable increase in capacity is part of the Government’s energy policy. But that should only take place after a detailed study of landscape character has been carried out.”

“We believe it should be called-in for determination by the Government.”

Dr Diane Green, inspector of historic buildings for English Heritage in the region, said: “We are uncomforable about the scale of impact the wind farm will have on the landacape and its heritage assets.”

Martin Wood, RWE’s developer of the scheme, said that a public exhibition had been held last summer, attended by 200 local residents.

“The feedback from questionnaires highlighted that 65 per cent of the 75 respondees supported the proposal,” he said.

He added the capacity of the development would be about 20 to 30 megawatts, producing enough electricity to meet the average annual electricity consumption for between 9700 and 14,500 homes, depending on when the wind farm would not be generating when there was low or no wind speed.

Mr Wood said the company had consulted with RDC, Natural England, RSPB, English Heritage, Ministry of Defence and the Environment Agency which had helped to shape the design of the proposed wind farm.

“The constraints identified through consultations have been taken into consideration to ensure that the wind farm will have minimal environmental and social impacts and will be sympathetic to the surrounding area. We have taken care to design it in a way that means its visual impact from key viewpoints is minimised,” he said.

Mr Wood said that following the consultations the number of proposed turbines had been reduced from 13 to 10 and the most northerly sited turbines were moved further south from the escarpment edge.

Meanwhile, Paul Stephens, of Moor Farm, West Heslerton, who flies a light aircraft from a nearby airstrip, said he would not be able to outfly the turbines because of their height. In addition, his daughter has an equestrian business and trains young competition riders.

“They will be a huge hazard to horse riders,” he said.

County Coun Ron Haigh said: “I do not want to see the small Wolds villages suffer as a result of heavy traffic thundering through them.

For me the jury is still out on the viability of wind farms.”

RDC is expected to make a decision on the application later this summer.

Source:  Gazette & Herald, www.gazetteherald.co.uk 18 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky