[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Residents' anger as wind farm gets green light  

Credit:  Darlington & Stockton Times, www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk 16 May 2011 ~~

A controversial wind farm has won Government approval after campaigners called for a public inquiry into the scheme.

Banks Developments has been cleared to start work on four, 125m turbines at Lambs Hill Farm, near Stillington.

The Lambs Hill Action Group (LHAG) asked for the planning application to be reviewed after raising concerns over how the decision was made by Stockton Borough Council.

But the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has now decided the scheme, between Darlington and Stockton, does not require further investigation.

Phil Dyke, development director of Banks Renewables said: “Our Lambs Hill proposals gathered a lot of support from a large cross-section of the local community during the extensive public consultation process we carried out.

“We were pleased that the application was recommended for approval by the council’s officers and that it was also supported by the council’s planning committee, showing their commitment to generating renewable energy at a local scale.

“We are very happy that DCLG has decided that there is no need for any further review of our planning application and that we will now be able to take this project forward.”

The scheme was approved by the council in March but the action group’s concerns led to a delay.

The group felt it was not given the opportunity to air all its concerns at the planning meeting.

And it was worried about a number of issues, including the visual impact, the close proximity to houses and potential noise disturbance.

Tom Kirby, spokesman for the group, said: “We are disappointed and bemused by the decision. We realised we were fighting a losing battle from that start but that is not a reason to fight it anyway.

“The enthusiasm for these schemes seems to be fading fast because the figures just dont back up the claims that are being made for wind farms.

“I want to make it clear we are not against sea based renewable energy generation but we do oppose land based schemes.”

The company has said that preparatory work is expected to start on site by May 2012.

Source:  Darlington & Stockton Times, www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk 16 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.