[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm restrictions hurt neighbors, too 

Credit:  The Journal Gazette, www.jg.net 15 May 2011 ~~

I read with interest Stacey Stumpf’s article “A blow to wind farms” (May 1). We have no argument with wind power per se, as we use a 20-foot windmill to aerate our pond. We do take issue, however, with 400-plus-foot industrial wind turbines in anyone’s backyard by creating an “overlay” district.

This means an area zoned agricultural or residential can have an industrial zone overlay to allow exceptions to the very zoning laws meant to protect our rights as property owners. As Stumpf quite correctly stated, any true conservative should be apprehensive about any law giving power of eminent domain to a private company.

She may not realize this is exactly what Wind Capital Group proposes for Whitley County. The original ordinance endorsed by WCG required only 1,000-foot setback from these massive towers to the nearest residence (not property line or outbuildings).

If this had passed, a private company and property owner (person who signed a lease agreement) could claim eminent domain on any land between a neighbor’s residence and a 400-foot tower, severely limiting its use. By doing the math, up to 20 acres of land could be acquired with no compensation to the landowner who happens to have the bad luck to live next to a lease signer (who is compensated) and now has to live with the lost property value, noise and loss of rural lifestyle which drew many to the area in the first place.

These industrial wind parks need to be located in areas with low population density so they have minimal impact – not in bedroom communities near larger cities. This is what numerous communities have already discovered and why more study is needed before further construction.


Source:  The Journal Gazette, www.jg.net 15 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon