[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bourne voters set to review turbines 

Credit:  By Aaron Gouveia, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 7 May 2011 ~~

BOURNE – The fate of a bylaw amendment that could effectively nix a proposal for the construction of seven industrial-sized wind turbines is now in the hands of town meeting voters.

After hearing nearly three hours of emotional debate, Bourne Planning Board members chose not to make a positive or negative recommendation for the New Generation Wind project proposed for Bournedale. Instead, the panel voted 8-1 to recommend further study of the project and to have board chairman Christopher Farrell make a presentation to voters.

Peter Meier, a board member who also is a candidate for selectman, was the lone dissenter.

Town meeting voters can either follow the planning board’s recommendation and send the bylaw back for further study, or possibly accept it, reject it or amend it.

“The important thing is town meeting voters will get their say,” Meier said following Friday’s planning board meeting.

Plans call for six 2.5-megawatt turbines and one 2-megawatt turbine in Bournedale in a proposed technology park. Panhandle Trust owner Tudor “Jerry” Ingersoll and the Lorusso family, owners of Cape Cod Aggregates, would build three turbines at a Cape Cod Aggregates gravel pit, one on Cape Cod Aggregates-owned land off Route 6, and the three other turbines on land near Route 25.

The 15-page bylaw amendment seeks several new restrictions on wind turbines, including rules that would increase setbacks, expand fall zones and limit shadow flicker, said Christopher Senie, a Westboro-based attorney who represents 29 Bournedale households opposed to the project.

Under the current bylaws, which were passed last year, the fall zone is the total height of a turbine plus an additional 10 feet. There is no acoustic setback listed.

Senie said the bylaw amendment is suggesting a fall and ice shed zone of 994 feet from the nearest property lines, up from 502 feet. It also proposes an acoustic setback of 10 times the rotor blade diameter, which means all houses would be a minimum of 3,280 feet from a turbine.

Shadow flicker would be limited to five hours per year.

While the majority of the residents who packed Friday’s meeting favored the new restrictions, opponents of the bylaw amendment said the restrictive measures translate into a moratorium on large-scale turbines.

“It is a bad planning policy to react to one particular project,” said Diane Tillotson, an attorney for New Generation Wind. “You’d essentially prohibit any commercial wind resource.”

Town Planner Coreen Moore took the proposed wind turbine restrictions and used town maps to research how the erection of turbines would be impacted if the measure passes.

Residential 10-kilowatt turbines could be located at only 37 sites, Moore said. Community scale 100-kilowatt turbines could be sited in 13 locations, and 500-kilowatt machines would be limited to three parcels.

The Massachusetts Maritime Academy’s 660-kilowatt turbine would not have been built under the proposed amended bylaw because dormitories are less than 600 feet from the turbine.

The one thing both sides agree on is that the current bylaw that took effect last year needs fine-tuning. And planning board member Douglas Shearer said he is seeking middle ground.

“There’s got to be some leeway in between,” he said. “I struggle with looking at the maps and supporting either bylaw at this point.”

Special town meeting is set to begin Monday at 7:30 p.m. in the Bourne High School auditorium.

Source:  By Aaron Gouveia, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 7 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky