[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Connecticut Siting Council holds another hearing on proposed wind turbines in Colebrook 

Credit:  By JASON SIEDZIK, Register Citizen staff, registercitizen.com 5 May 2011 ~~

NEW BRITAIN – As the Connecticut Siting Council holds another evidentiary hearing on the proposed wind turbines in Colebrook, Prospect could once again be a precedent-setter.

An informal straw poll taken at a council meeting earlier in the week showed nearly the entire board in favor of rejecting BNE Energy’s plan to build two industrial turbines in Prospect. The turbines would be similar to the six proposed turbines in Colebrook. Size and siting concerns have been raised regarding the Prospect plan, which is similar to the Colebrook opposition.

A rejection by the Connecticut Siting Council would be exceedingly rare. Cornwall First Selectman Gordon Ridgeway said after the council approved a cell phone tower in town that approximately 95 percent of applications which have gone before the Connecticut Siting Council are approved. Paul Corey, BNE Energy’s chairman, emphasized that applicants have to do their homework before applying, though.

The hearing will focus on Colebrook North, the project on Rock Hall Road. According to Stella and Michael Somers, the owners of the Rock Hall Inn Bed and Breakfast, the turbines will be close enough to spoil views from the Rock Hall Inn. BNE Energy has countered this claim with a video simulation of the turbines from the viewpoint of Rock Hall Inn. The video was submitted to the Connecticut Siting Council as evidence Wednesday.

To a degree, the opposition to the turbines in Colebrook has been personal. Recently filed evidence in the proceedings illustrates this, as one of the parties filed a motion to have their medical records sealed under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

The evidentiary hearing should be the final round, according to the Connecticut Siting Council’s schedule. Draft findings of fact are scheduled to be released for review May 19, and the record will be closed June 2. A decision on the Prospect turbines, meanwhile, is due May 16.

Source:  By JASON SIEDZIK, Register Citizen staff, registercitizen.com 5 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky