LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Earley windfarm plans thrown out 

Credit:  The Reading Chronicle, www.readingchronicle.co.uk 3 May 2011 ~~

Hundreds of people clapped and cheered as a major application to build “looming and imposing” wind turbines in Earley was thrown out by councillors.

Homeowners who have campaigned for years against the four 80 metre (262ft) high wind turbines on Reading University-owned land at Rushy Mead in Lower Earley, south of the M4, turned out in force to hear the outcome of the controversial plans, which were submitted back in 2008 by Carbon Trust’s Partnership for Renewables (PfR).

Mike Heard, from Arborfield Parish Council, told Wokingham’s planning committee: “Good planning ensures the right development in the right place at the right time and this is not it. This area is important to local people. It is one of the few recreational areas available which will be blighted by these turbines.

“The turbines are too close to people’s homes and the noise should be taken into consideration. I object to this proposal in the strongest terms.”

But Stephen Ainger, from PfR, said: “We have liaised with the community and reduced the number of turbines. We are only paid for the amount of power we produce and the turbines would provide cheap electricity to nearby businesses.

“Turbines are regarded as good neighbours and this proposal is informed by years of research.”

Councillors voted unanimously against the application at the meeting on Wednesday last week. For more on this story, pick up Thursday’s Reading Chronicle.

Source:  The Reading Chronicle, www.readingchronicle.co.uk 3 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky