LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power Compass contradicts other data 

Credit:  Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com 1 May 2011 ~~

Alison Hagerstrom’s Maine Compass (April 18) on the subject of wind power left me wondering from what sources she gleaned her information, as it seems to differ substantially from that which others have discovered through in-depth investigation of the issue of industrial wind development.

Hagerstrom states than an increasing number of Mainers support industrial wind development, when there is actually no verification that this is true. The use of polls, the results of which are often determined by manipulation the phraseology of the questions, should be viewed with suspicion, at the very least.

She also implies that the development of industrial wind facilities does not negatively affect the tourism industry in the areas where they are located. This claim contradicts information from other regions, defies common sense, and does not reflect the concerns of many who are involved in Maine’s tourism industry.

The Maine Sporting Camp Owners Association and Maine Registered Guides Association, along with a number of innkeepers, restaurant owners, campground owners and other business that rely on tourism for their survival have come out steadfastly in opposition to industrial wind development on our mountaintops, ridge lines and hills.

Perhaps Hagerstrom should attend more to the needs of those whom she represents in her official capacity and less to the empty promises and unsubstantiated claims of the developers and proponents of an industry that has consistently exaggerated its benefits while trying to dismiss the negative effects of its presence.

Unfortunately, space restrictions do not allow me to address other questionable statements found in her column. I hope that she will try to gain more insight into the deficiencies of industrial wind facilities, will analyze the benefits versus the costs of these developments more thoroughly, and will reconsider her position on this subject.

David Small

Norridgewock

Source:  Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com 1 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky