[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Committee kills stricter rules for wind farms  

Credit:  By Heather J. Carlson, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 28 April 2011 ~~

ST. PAUL – Wind farm supporters and opponents packed a House committee room on Wednesday facing off on whether stricter setbacks for large-scale wind projects are needed to protect landowners.

The debate centered on a bill introduced by Red Wing Republican Rep. Tim Kelly. The measure would require that in areas that have at least 3 1/2 homes per square mile, wind turbines could not be built within a half-mile of the property line of a landowner who was not participating in the wind project. Kelly said research shows that at this population density opposition to wind farm projects increases dramatically. He said he believes that is part of the problem in Goodhue County where a large number of citizens are protesting proposed wind projects.

“As we move further and further down this road, we are starting to encroach on areas that may just not be the right place (for wind turbines),” Kelly said.

But representatives from wind farm companies argue that this bill would prevent several projects in the state from moving ahead and put a chilling effect on wind energy in the state. Blake Nixon, president of Geronimo Wind Energy, told members of the House Agriculture and Rural Policy Committee that wind development provides good paying jobs in rural areas.

Read in Thursday’s print edition what others say are concerns about wind development.

[rest of article available at source]
Source:  By Heather J. Carlson, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 28 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter