[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bourne turbine bylaw revision: All? Or nothing?  

Credit:  Bourne Courier, www.wickedlocal.com 28 April 2011 ~~

Bourne selectmen are praising efforts by Concerned Citizens for Responsible Energy to amend the zoning bylaw that governs municipal review of turbine projects.

The board has accommodated the citizen group by calling a May 9 Special Town Meeting to make sure voters have a say in any bylaw change. But doubt remains as to whether the amendment article would ban – anywhere in town – industrial-grade turbines similar to those proposed by New Generation Wind off Scenic Highway and Route 25.

If such structures could not be situated anywhere in Bourne, the bylaw amendment would serve to create a de facto moratorium on the taller turbines. James Potter of the citizen group says this is not its intent.

Selectmen Chairman John Ford, however, wants a report by Town Planner Coreen Moore prior to May 9.

“I’d like to hear her position on this,” Ford said. On what could be built (if the bylaw amendment passes with voters) or what cannot be built. I don’t think it’s all-or-nothing.”

Ford said industrial grade turbines – such as those proposed by Tudor Ingersoll and Sam Lorusso of New Generation Wind – would dominate the Bourne landscape. “These turbines make the Bourne Bridge look small,” he told his cable television audience.

The citizen-petition amendment to the turbine bylaw was tabled by the planning board. So it will be indefinitely postponed at the May 2 annual meeting. But the planning board meets again May 6 to reconsider the amendment now that selectmen have forced the issue with a May 9 special session.

Town Administrator Thomas Guerino suggests there may have been “a technical flaw” in the planning board’s vote to table amendment consideration. The planners, however, said they did not have enough time to read and digest revisions to the amendment article.

Source:  Bourne Courier, www.wickedlocal.com 28 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.