[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

RI high court: Firms have standing to challenge wind farm  

Credit:  Alex Kuffner, Projo 7 to 7 News Blog, projo.com 22 April 2011 ~~

PROVIDENCE – The Rhode Island Supreme Court has ruled that two large manufacturers have legal standing to challenge a key approval for a wind farm proposed in waters off Block Island, but the court decided that a regional environmental group does not have standing and cannot continue in the case.

In a decision released Friday morning, the court said that the appeal lodged by Toray Plastics and Polytop Corporation can progress to a full hearing, scheduled for May 11. The two companies, both heavy users of electricity, object to the high price of power in a contract between Deepwater Wind, the company developing the 5-8 turbine wind farm about three miles southeast of Block Island, and National Grid, the state’s dominant electric utility. Together, the plastics manufacturers appealed the state Public Utilities Commission’s approval of the power purchase agreement last August.

The Conservation Law Foundation also lodged an appeal, arguing that an amendment last year to state law that facilitated the agreement amounted to special-interest legislation designed to benefit Deepwater.

Then-Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch was also part of the appeal, but his successor in office, Peter F. Kilmartin, a supporter of the Deepwater project, dropped out of the case after winning election.

The issue of standing was raised by the court after the attorney general’s office dropped its appeal early this year. At a hearing April 6, Michael R. McElroy, lawyer for the plastics companies, and Jerry Elmer, staff attorney for the Conservation Law Foundation, argued why they should be allowed to continue the case.

McElroy said his clients have standing because they will have to pay millions of dollars in additional electric distribution fees to National Grid because the above-market costs of the wind farm will be shared throughout the state power system. Elmer said that Conservation Law Foundation has standing because its members will be directly affected by climate change if the controversy surrounding the Deepwater project delays other renewable energy developments.

A lawyer for Deepwater and National Grid argued against their petitions as did an attorney representing the governor’s office and General Assembly leaders.

Source:  Alex Kuffner, Projo 7 to 7 News Blog, projo.com 22 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.