[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Barnstable county sets standards for wind turbines on land 

Credit:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 21 April 2011 ~~

BARNSTABLE – County officials approved standards for land-based wind turbines Wednesday but sent a 65-foot height threshold for Cape Cod Commission review back to the drawing board.

“I think it’s a good result,” said Paul Niedzwiecki, the planning and regulatory agency’s executive director. “We’ve made progress in this discussion.”

During its regular meeting, the Barnstable County Assembly of Delegates approved new standards for noise, shadow flicker and other aspects of wind energy projects that are reviewed by the commission. Because the height threshold was rejected, only projects that are referred to the commission by a town or appear before the agency for other reasons, such as the clearing of more than 2 acres, will be affected by the regulations.

The debate over where wind turbines should be placed on Cape Cod has boiled over in the past year, with opponents claiming that noise and other aspects of a turbine’s operation can have harmful health effects on neighbors and reduce property values.

Proponents of wind energy say the projects are necessary to reduce the use of fossil fuels and to reduce the amount municipalities pay for electricity.

Assembly delegates from 10 towns – 69 percent of the panel’s weighted vote – approved the new standards.

The county’s legislative body is made up of a representative from each of the Cape’s 15 towns. Each delegate has a vote based on its town’s population.

Specifics for the standards will be fleshed out in so-called “technical bulletins” during consultation with a citizens advisory committee and objective experts, Niedzwiecki said.

“Voting for the standards means that the conversation and the narrowing of the differences can continue at another level,” he said.

The commission will also begin working on revising a model wind energy bylaw that towns could use to designate a height threshold to trigger review by the commission, Niedzwiecki said.

The assembly sent the 65-foot height threshold back to the commission for more study based on concerns raised by some members about what seemed to them an arbitrary number.

“I couldn’t find a satisfactory explanation for the height that was chosen as the trigger,” said Yarmouth’s representative, Spyro Mitrokostas. “It will tend to catch every project that is proposed from here on out.”

Not every wind turbine proposed on the Cape has a regional impact, Mitrokostas said.

Other representatives argued that towns could always control the height trigger for commission review under a proposed ordinance that would allow municipalities to adopt their own bylaws.

“What’s wrong with that approach?” Provincetown delegate Cheryl Andrews asked.

Towns could create their own bylaw regardless of the commission’s involvement, Mitrokostas countered.

In addition, towns would have the discretion to refer any project to the commission for review, Harwich delegate Leo Cakounes said.

“The towns do have the ability to send a project of even 45 feet to the Cape Cod Commission,” Cakounes said.

Opponents of locating turbines near residential neighborhoods called the adoption of the standards a victory.

The regulations are sorely needed and long overdue, said Eric Bibler, a vocal opponent of various wind energy projects across the Cape.

Despite the progress on standards for projects that appear before the commission for other reasons, opponents of projects in the region continue to have concerns about the height threshold, he said.

“The referral can only be made by town boards or committees,” Bibler said of projects referred to the commission, adding that residents who do not have the support of a town board have little recourse if they object to a project.

Source:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 21 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky