LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Paying for wind energy just doesn’t add up 

Credit:  www.sctimes.com 15 April 2011 ~~

Not wishing to pour cold water on enthusiasm for the VA wind turbine project (“Our View: VA’s turbine makes good case study,” April 3) nor desirous of being a spoilsport on the potential of wind energy, I must nonetheless take issue with the conclusion of the 25-year payback period.

Where does the money to finance the wind turbine come from? At a cost of $2.3 million and a projected annual energy savings of $89,000, that amounts to a little less than 4 percent return on investment.

Much like the city of St. Paul and its analysis of solar panels on public buildings, this amount calculated recoup of the initial cost minus any cost for the money to create the power source.

Granted, energy costs are increasing and alternative energy sources should be researched and tested, but a 25-year payback period, given the numbers, is unrealistic.

At 2.5 percent interest my calculations leave $31,500 annually to amortize the $2.3 million cost, taking 73 years, and at 3 percent loan interest there is only $20,000 of the $89,000 left for loan payback. That equals 115 years to recover the initial investment.

Even if this was paid for with a government grant, there is no free lunch. Somebody has to pay the cost of providing the input cash. Energy costs will certainly continue to escalate and likely improve the payback scenario, but anyone contemplating such projects must recognize that there is interest on the investment to be paid when considering feasibility.

Mike Foley, Sauk Centre

Source:  www.sctimes.com 15 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon