[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eminent domain measure stalls in Montana Senate 

Credit:  By MIKE DENNISON, Missoulian State Bureau, missoulian.com 11 April 2011 ~~

HELENA – A state Senate panel Monday voted to table a high-profile bill designed to override a court decision that has stalled construction of a northern Montana power line to transport wind energy – but it’s unclear whether the measure is dead at the Legislature.

The Senate Energy Committee deadlocked Monday on House Bill 198, which would clarify that power-line companies can use “eminent domain” to condemn property along a line’s permitted route. The committee then to “table” or kill the bill.

HB198 would override a state District Court decision that has snarled plans for the 215-mile Montana Alberta Tie Limited power line, stretching from Great Falls to Lethbridge, Alberta.

The court decision said state law doesn’t give MATL the power of eminent domain, which allows entities to condemn and purchase private property for a “public use,” such as a building a power line, pipeline or highway.

MATL is trying to use eminent domain to condemn a small piece of property near Cut Bank, where a landowner does not want the line to go through sites of historic Native American tepee rings.

MATL has appealed the December 2010 decision to the Montana Supreme Court, but the company and other business interests had hoped the Legislature would pass HB198, which they said simply makes clear that power lines such as MATL have always had the power of eminent domain.

Darryl James, a lobbyist representing MATL, said work on the line in Montana has been shut down for more than a month and now probably won’t start up again until the court case is resolved.

“At this point, it looks like all we’re going to do is rely on the court,” he said after the committee vote.

Sen. Alan Olson, R-Roundup, who chairs the Senate Energy Committee, said the votes don’t exist in the full Senate to remove the bill from committee and bring it to the floor.

Olson did schedule another meeting of his committee today (Tuesday), but said it was merely to discuss the panel’s session-end dinner, and that he had no plans to bring up HB198.

However, at least one member of the committee who voted against the bill indicated late Monday that he might be persuaded to change his vote.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen,” said Sen. Kendall Van Dyk, D-Billings. “It’s certainly a struggle. I wasn’t ready to vote ‘yes’ (Monday). I may change my mind. … I’ve got a feeling this isn’t done yet.”

Supporters of the MATL line and HB198 said Monday they’re disappointed with the committee’s decision.

“I guess the majority of Democrats on that committee have decided against clean energy,” said Jim Jensen, executive director of the Montana Environmental Information Center, one of the state’s most prominent environmental groups. “That was the vote this Legislature for clean energy.”

“I’m very disappointed in the vote and particularly disappointed that the Democrats would kill the bill leading to a billion dollars of renewable energy development in Montana,” said John Fitzpatrick, director of government affairs for NorthWestern Energy, the state’s largest electric utility. “There was a chance for bipartisan resolution to this issue, and it was squandered.”


One Democrat on the committee, Sen. Ron Erickson of Missoula, and five Republicans voted to approve HB198 and send it to the Senate floor for debate and a vote.

The panel’s other four Democrats and two Republicans voted against it, resulting in a 6-6 tie. The panel then voted 8-4 to table the measure.

Erickson said his “yes” vote was one of the toughest decisions he’d made as a legislator, but that he believed the bill was critical for construction of the power line and development of wind power in the state.

“I’m afraid if House Bill 198 does not pass, we will dampen at least for a while and perhaps permanently wind energy coming out of this state,” he said.

Space on the MATL line has been reserved primarily by potential wind-farm developers. The proposed 309-megawatt Rimrock wind farm near Cut Bank has been looking to use the MATL line to export its power.

Senate Majority Leader Jeff Essmann, R-Billings, who voted against HB198, said the measure has been a “high stakes game of poker” between power companies and landowners, and that neither one has been willing to give on the issue of eminent domain.

“A court only has one way of resolving issues: There is going to be a winner and a loser,” he said. “At this point, either could lose, and will have nothing for their effort. If they want to play their game in court, I guess that’s where they’ll play.”

Also voting against the bill were Republican Sen. Jason Priest of Red Lodge and Democratic Sens. Linda Moss of Billings, Mitch Tropila of Great Falls and Shannon Augare of Browning.

Voting for the bill were Erickson and Republican Sens. Bob Lake of Hamilton, Olson, Ed Walker of Billings, Verdell Jackson of Kalispell and Chas Vincent of Libby.

Source:  By MIKE DENNISON, Missoulian State Bureau, missoulian.com 11 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky