[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm company asks for extra time in zoning rule  

Credit:  Written by MAX SHOWALTER, www.jconline.com 6 April 2011 ~~

A wind energy company with plans for Tippecanoe County is asking the county to allow additional time for complex construction projects in the county’s zoning rules.

But it will be at least one more month before any changes are recommended to the special exception section of Tippecanoe County’s Unified Zoning Ordinance.

Under the current rules, a special exception granted for a specific use expires one year after it has been authorized – if the use has not been established.

The ordinance committee of the Tippecanoe County Area Plan Commission is considering a request to alter that one-year rule for a specific project.

Invenergy Wind LLC of Chicago is seeking to change the requirement to a three-year window for a 133-turbine wind farm project the company is planning in southwestern Tippecanoe County.

“The reason for the extension is related to the amount of detail and work, design and planning,” Greg Leuchtmann, development manager for the Invenergy project, told the ordinance committee this afternoon. “This is about a special exception for zoning purposes, not a building permit.”

Approximately 20 people attended the meeting, and most were opposed to altering the special exception one-year requirement.

Their complaints included the lack of an economic development plan for the project, slowing the development of roads to serve the wind turbines and the extension allowing the work to be drawn out, which could cause additional disruptions.

“It does not take 12 to 18 months to get 130 turbines up,” said Kay Pairitz of West Point.

“Any time we’re granting developers more rights, we’re taking away the rights of others,” said Tim Strueh, a Linden resident. “We don’t have protection from the noise. We lose the right to health and safety.”

The APC ordinance committee voted today to continue consideration of the special exception request to their meeting May 4.

Source:  Written by MAX SHOWALTER, www.jconline.com 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.