[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Protesters delighted as council amends reasons to refuse wind farm 

Credit:  Scunthorpe Telegraph, www.thisisscunthorpe.co.uk 7 April 2011 ~~

Councillors have finalised their reasons for rejecting plans for a six-turbine windfarm.

Permission for the Grange Wind Farm facility at Flixborough Grange was originally set to be turned down due its potential impact on the landscape.

But councillors have now added noise and health implications to the reasons for refusal, after a planning committee meeting yesterday at Pittwood House.

Steve Fuller, an engineer speaking on behalf of the people of Burton-upon-Stather, highlighted the noise issues that the windfarm would create.

He said: “It is good to see that people are listening to our proposals. A lot of the noise created is not straightforward and I am glad they have listened to what we have said.”

Councillor Bernard Regan spoke passionately about the health-related reasons for refusing the plans, touching on the effects they would have on families with autistic children in the surrounding area.

Two earlier applications from developer RidgeWind had previously been thrown out with one being turned down after a public inquiry. Dave Gylliatt, a Burton-upon-Stather resident, said: “It is a great result for the people of Burton-upon-Stather, because two more important factors have been added to the reasons for refusal.

“We are pleased to see our voices being heard, and that important further measures are being taken.

“It was implied that health reasons were not going to be included in the reasons for refusal, but we are delighted to see that they are being taken into consideration.

“I believe it would be ludicrous not to look at the effect a windfarm could have on people’s health. The proposals for a windfarm have been rejected time and time again, and these added reasons for refusal will do even more to stop any plans from going ahead.”

RidgeWind were unavailable for comment.

Source:  Scunthorpe Telegraph, www.thisisscunthorpe.co.uk 7 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky