[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Packed house for wind meeting  

Credit:  by John Divinski, www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca 6 April 2011 ~~

Moratoriums, setbacks, decommissioning and health.

These were the four major issues to come out of the special meeting on turbines in Kincardine on Tuesday night.

Several speakers asked for a moratorium on new development for the next two to six months to see if a middle ground can be reached between the municipality and the wind developers.

Barb Ashbee came in from Orangeville to talk of the ills her family suffered when they lived near a wind farm in the Flesherton area.

She said her family had constant headaches and suffered from tinnitus while her husband’s thyroid was out of control.

She says it all disappeared when they moved away from the turbines.

Meanwhile, Kincardine council has approved a draft policy that would fatten the set-backs of the turbines to three thousand meters in urban areas; 2750 meters in rural hamlets and 800 meters in farm areas.

The General Manager of Leader Wind Resources Eric Monrad says the jury is still out on the new proposals.

He says the province is the guiding body for this sort of thing and if the municipality has stricter conditions, they’ll have to see how it affects their projects.

Kincardine councillor Randy Roppel says the municipality needs to take a stand.

He says council is responsible for the health and well-being of its residents.

The proposed wind turbine policy will be before a regular Kincardine council meeting on April 13th for further discussion on wind turbine development.

Source:  by John Divinski, www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.