[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind turbine siting bill killed, 11-8  

Credit:  Posted by Betsy, The Spokesman-Review, www.spokesman.com 6 April 2011 ~~

The House State Affairs Committee, after a heated debate, has voted 11-8 to kill HB 342, Rep. Tom Loertscher’s bill to give veto power over wind turbines to property owners within 2 miles, and instead refer the issue to the Legislature’s interim committee on energy. “This is about the little guy,” Loertscher argued; he said he can see dozens of wind turbines from his property. Rep. Janice McGeachin, R-Idaho Falls, said developers and county commissioners are “salivating” over the financial benefits of wind power projects, and said, “This issue is an issue that is driven by money, and unfortunately money clouds our judgment sometimes.”

Rep. Bert Stevenson, R-Rupert, said the interim committee had a subcommittee study the siting issue, it “spent a tremendous amount of time, and the conclusion of that subcommittee was that siting is a local issue.” Rep. Eric Anderson, R-Priest Lake, noted that HB 342 is a last-minute bill at the end of the session that went to the State Affairs committee rather than the energy committee. Rep. Erik Simpson, R-Idaho Falls, compared wind developers to old-time railroad “robber barons.” There was much testimony for and against the bill this morning, from everyone from wind developers (opposed) to county commissioners (opposed) to a sobbing real estate agent who described how she couldn’t sell a house that’s near wind turbines (in favor), despite lovely staging and the smell of freshly-baked cookies.

Source:  Posted by Betsy, The Spokesman-Review, www.spokesman.com 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: