[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

From pan into fire  

Credit:  The Chronicle Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com 6 April 2011 ~~

Re It’s Not Over Yet; Group Prepares New Wind Farm Battle Tactics, C-J. April 5:
City councillors who voted for this so-called “compromise” have set Thunder Bay up for decades of problems.
By voting for an open-ended 45-year contract with a proven problem-child developer we can expect to be dealing with financial, environmental, planning and construction woes at every turn. This developer’s record with the city speaks for itself.
What is in the new agreement is shocking. It gives Horizon more towers than it ever asked, of unlimited heights, greater leased land and private access over a supposed easement.
But what is most worrying is what wasn’t in the City Solicitor Memorandum and proposed changes to the agreement.
The chronological history left out any mention of any of the public deputations, NMEPC open houses (councillors attended) or significant community concerns.
The financial implications was the smallest section in the memorandum and only spoke to the lawsuit. It failed to discuss liabilities for decommissioning, liability for construction before the renewable energy approval, possible lawsuits over improper land-taking (Loch Lomond Road) and loss of enjoyment.
The city as landowner will be responsible ultimately for activities on its land and should noise be greater than “modelled,” or blasting cause problems outside its property, it will be financially (and morally) liable.
There was no mention of how the city can justify taking a road easement across private property for the purpose of this private development. Easements are provided for specific purposes, not so the city can facilitate its own projects for its own gain.
There was no mention of a clear and well-defined dispute-resolution process. Given the problems so far, that should have been the first item in this agreement.
So the city has given Horizon complete and total control of up to 20,000 acres for up to 45 years to build turbines of unlimited height without any ability for the city to comment or influence the design.
Those councillors who voted yes should hang their heads in shame. The people of Thunder Bay deserve better – a better deal, a real compromise, a say in decisions.
Karl Piirik
Thunder Bay

Source:  The Chronicle Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.