[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Delight as South Staffordshire wind farm plans rejected 

Credit:  Express & Star, www.expressandstar.com 6 April 2011 ~~

Campaigners spoke of their delight today after councillors rejected controversial plans for a wind farm that they claimed would blight the South Staffordshire countryside.

Councillors took the unusual step of praising protesters who fought proposals for six 413ft high turbines on the Bradford Estate near Weston Park.

More than 50 people from the Stop Turbines Action Group (STAG) toasted last night’s victory before immediately steeling themselves for another battle should developer Wind Prospect launch an appeal to the Secretary of State.

Chairman of the group Tony Lendon said: “The council was absolutely brilliant – I have never heard such a comprehensive rebuttal in all my life.

“But we are ready for whatever they will throw at us, and the only thing they can do is go to appeal.

“They are like a dog with a bone but we have got hold of the other end of it and we are not going to let go.

“We had to raise £16,000 to get this far and we already have the money to fight any appeal.”

Committee chairman Councillor Brian Cox told the meeting earlier: “I have never before received so many letters and emails objecting to a development, most of which raised good planning reasons for doing so. I would like to pay tribute to the people who have written those letters and emails.

“It’s my view that the developers totally underestimated the strength of feeling. Hundreds of people are in no doubt that these masts would have been severely detrimental to this tranquil area of countryside.”

STAG spokesman Graham Parker said the turbines would be a blot on the landscape and would ruin the views from their homes and dominate the skyline.

The road infrastructure was ill-equipped to cope with the volume of lorry traffic it would have to withstand during construction, while the noise would be unbearable for householders, he added.

Paul Grimshaw, development manager at Wind Prospect, had argued the development was crucial for the country.

He added: “Nationally and regionally we are behind on renewable energy targets. We should be looking to explore onshore wind energy at every opportunity.”

Source:  Express & Star, www.expressandstar.com 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky