[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm bill concerns Cassia County officials  

Credit:  By Laurie Welch - Times-News writer, www.magicvalley.com 5 April 2011 ~~

BURLEY – “Vague language” in a wind-energy bill has piqued Cassia County officials’ concern about keeping their local authority.

House Bill 342, introduced Monday, addresses the siting of wind turbines, including their “visual effects” and “shadow flicker.”

House Assistant Majority Leader Scott Bedke, R-Oakley, told county commissioners during a Monday conference call that the bill will likely end up in an interim committee. There, it would be studied over the rest of 2011 before moving again in the Legislature next year.

“Although the bill may appear to have legs, I don’t think it will make it through (this session),” Bedke said.

The bill is sponsored by Rep. Tom Loertscher, R-Iona, and stems from issues in Bonneville County, where commissioners allowed turbines to be placed near a residential area, Bedke said.

It was introduced after a separate bill to put a two-year moratorium on new wind farms failed, Bedke said.

“The whole issue begs for more study,” Bedke said.

Loertscher’s bill defines terms and sets out procedures and minimum standards for the placement of wind energy facilities. It would forbid counties from approving a turbine when its base would be less than 2 miles from a residential property line, unless the property owner waived the issue. Counties also could not green-light sites at less than the distance required to prevent moving shadows, shadow flicker or other visual effects to appear on land not owned by the wind company or on a public highway.

The bill also requires that landowners within 2 miles and any city within 5 miles be notified of a new wind project.

Cassia County Administrator Kerry McMurray said the bill shifts any litigation expense stemming from wind turbine siting issues to counties.

“When you are talking about visual effects, you are asking for a lawsuit if that means if you can see it from a highway or a house,” said county Prosecutor Al Barrus. “I can’t go along with a bill that has such vague language.”

Bedke said the minimum standards would not necessarily be a negative measure and would function like minimum state requirements in place for CAFOs.

“Whatever the state does, it will leave enough room for the counties to shape and mold them,” Bedke said.

Bedke also updated the commission on legislation split into two bills Monday that would extend a tax rebate for alternative-energy producers while changing the amount utilities are required to pay for them.

Bedke said the legislation will mean lost tax breaks for wind energy producers who don’t have projects already in the works.

Development of future wind products will possibly come down to economies of scale, Bedke said, and larger Idaho wind farms.

Bedke later told the Times-News that he thinks Cassia County has done a good job siting wind farms.

In other business, the commissioners unanimously approved a fee increase for agricultural building siting from $50 to $75 and set a $25 fee for a flood plain development permit. Previously there was no charge for the permit.

Source:  By Laurie Welch - Times-News writer, www.magicvalley.com 5 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.