[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine buffer limit ‘silly, arbitrary’  

Credit:  BY NEELIMA CHOAHAN, Melton Weekly, www.meltonweekly.com.au 5 April 2011 ~~

A two-kilometre buffer zone for wind farms will not protect houses from excessive noise, according to Victorian Greens MP Greg Barber.

Speaking to the Weekly, the upper house MP said the figure identified by the state government as part of changes announced last month was a “silly, arbitrary number”.

“I could be upwind behind a hill with a six-lane freeway between me and the wind farm and still be two kilometres away,” he said.

Mr Barber’s comments come in the wake of a Senate inquiry into wind farms.

The Senate met in Ballarat and Melbourne and concluded its inquiry in Perth on Thursday.

The federal government-initiated inquiry investigated the social and economic impacts of rural wind farms, in particular possible adverse health effects for people living nearby.

It also examined concerns over the excessive noise and vibrations emitted by wind farms and their impact on property values, employment opportunities and farm income.

Mr Barber, who attended the Melbourne leg of the inquiry, said a noise standard developed in New Zealand and adopted in Victoria was a more practical way of measuring noise pollution.

New Zealand uses a noise assessment tool to determine which pre-existing ambient background sound levels are exceeded by wind farm noise.

Mr Barber said a 40-decibel sound limit may or may not equate to two kilometres and was more dependent upon the direction of the house in relation to the wind farm.

“I challenge the contention that two kilometres is a magic number,” he said.

Moorabool mayor Pat Griffin agreed that more scientific research was needed into the effects of low-frequency noise.

“It does depend upon environmental conditions, which way wind is blowing, whether you are on top of the hill or top of the valley, whether you have cloud cover,” he said.

But having last month welcomed the new guidelines, the mayor called on the Greens MP to come up with a better alternative.

“Maybe we should be making it five kilometres. It’s all fine for Mr Barber to say the two-kilometre limit has no scientific standing; maybe he should go and visit the people affected.”

The council has asked Planning Minister Matthew Guy to overturn a three-turbine wind energy development at Pykes Hill under its two-kilometre guideline.

Two wind farms on the outskirts of Moorabool were approved last year by the previous government.

Source:  BY NEELIMA CHOAHAN, Melton Weekly, www.meltonweekly.com.au 5 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.