[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Guy spin on wind turbines  

Credit:  Peter Hunt, www.weeklytimesnow.com.au 4 April 2011 ~~

Opponents of Victoria’s wind farms have warned the Government not to back down on its promise to keep turbines away from homes.

The promise is that no turbine would be built within 2km of homes without residents’ agreement.

“If they’ve backed out, we’d be after them,” Landscape Guardians president Randall Bell said. “It’d be a backflip.”

Mr Bell said the group had found Planning Minister Matthew Guy’s failure to bed down the Coalition’s election promise “unsettling”.

In the lead-up to last November’s state election, the Coalition promised the placement of turbines would be no less than 2km from the nearest home, unless a contract between the resident and wind farm developer was agreed.

But after 100 days in government, Mr Guy issued a press release stating the government had “delivered on its election commitments to ensure homes within 2km of proposed wind turbines are considered in planning applications”.

But by the next week, Mr Guy’s office reassured The Weekly Times the government was still committed to the setback policy.

The Weekly Times asked Mr Guy if residents within 2km of a proposed wind farm had power of veto over its development.

Mr Guy’s spokeswoman said: “Yes, if no contract can be agreed over the placement of a turbine within this distance.”

Recently, wind-farm developer Pacific Hydro warned the Government’s policy would cripple the industry, as it gave small numbers of disgruntled residents the power of veto on multi-million dollar projects.

Mr Guy told ABC-TV last month that Pacific Hydro had got it wrong.

“What we are simply saying is residents that do live that close to turbines, they should have the right to be consulted,” he said.

Mr Guy then told The Weekly Times there would be “a dispute resolution mechanism … and if an agreement can’t be reached, then the default falls to the residents”.

Source:  Peter Hunt, www.weeklytimesnow.com.au 4 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.