[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

City utility’s offer for wind power criticized as too low  

Credit:  By ROSEMARY SHINOHARA, Anchorage Daily News, www.adn.com 1 April 2011 ~~

Anchorage’s city power utility made a long-awaited offer this week to buy wind power from Cook Inlet Region Inc., backers of a proposed wind turbine project on Fire Island.

But CIRI senior vice president Ethan Schutt said the offer is so low it’s ridiculous and contains unworkable terms.

Municipal Light and Power director Jim Posey held a press conference Thursday to explain the utility’s offer, which he said protects ML&P customers from higher costs.

CIRI wants to begin construction of turbines on Fire Island off Anchorage this summer, but has so far been unable to get any utility companies to sign contracts to buy the power it would generate, said company spokesman Jim Jager. “Realistically, the project isn’t going forward until we have power-purchase agreements,” he said in a recent interview.

The corporation is lined up to get nearly $44 million in federal grants to help build the turbines, but the money is contingent on starting this year. The state has approved using $25 million in public funds to build a transmission line from Fire Island to the mainland.

The first phase of the project – 22 turbines that could provide electricity for 12,000 households – would cost about $135 million, said Schutt.

CIRI is in what Schutt called “legitimate negotiations” with Chugach Electric Association, the Railbelt’s biggest electrical utility. But Chugach doesn’t want to take the entire output, so the project needs another power buyer, he said.

The details of the Chugach negotiations are confidential, he said.

Meantime, two Anchorage Assembly members this week introduced a proposal that could lead to the Assembly itself taking over negotiations with CIRI on behalf of ML&P if it decides the public interest would be served.

“I don’t intend to let the city lose in the ability to capture wind power,” said Assembly chairman Dick Traini, who is co-sponsoring the ordinance with Assembly member Bill Starr. “If you take a look at where we’re heading you have to diversify energy sources as much as possible.”

The Assembly proposal will be up for public hearing April 12. The Assembly has already passed a resolution supporting the wind project.

CIRI and ML&P are at odds over two key elements:

• The price ML&P would pay. At $30.20 per megawatt hour in 2013, the first year, the price is below the $48.72 average that ML&P pays for power now, said Schutt.

• A requirement by ML&P that CIRI predict the wind power a day in advance, and if it falls short, buy other power to replace the shortfall.

Posey said $30.20 represents costs ML&P would avoid if it bought wind power instead of buying from another source. Its “avoided cost” number is low, Posey said, because it owns its own Beluga gas fields, and gets fuel from that source more cheaply than other utilities can.

Schutt said a utility wouldn’t replace its lowest cost energy source with wind power, but would choose to offset higher-cost gas with it.

Posey said the requirement that CIRI provide predictable power whether the wind blows the right speed or not is reasonable and ensures that ML&P customers don’t pay extra, which they might have to do if the utility had to quickly replace expected wind power.

Predicting exact amounts of power the Fire Island turbines would generate at any moment in the future isn’t possible, said Schutt.

“That doesn’t work with wind. … That single item makes it unworkable,” he said.

Source:  By ROSEMARY SHINOHARA, Anchorage Daily News, www.adn.com 1 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.