[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind vs. nuclear power  

Credit:  The Baltimore Sun, www.baltimoresun.com 30 March 2011 ~~

While Jay Hancock documents the uncompetitive cost of offshore wind farms, there is one aspect of the cost equation that is not considered “Offshore wind farm is a bad idea that ought to be killed, March 27).

Wind power generation actually does not replace other sources of energy, which must be operationally available when there is insufficient wind to generate useable amounts of power.

When electrical energy requirements increase in response to economic and population growth, virtually every planned megawatt generated by future wind installations must be matched by an increase in reliable power generation capacity to insure a dependable supply system capable of meeting demand at all times.

Therefore, the cost of this additional capacity should be included in the cost of the wind power installations. This would render wind power uneconomical even with massive, unaffordable and economically disruptive government subsidies.

As has been noted previously in letters to The Sun, only nuclear power or fossil fueled installations can provide the scale and reliability required to support growing modern economies. Natural gas, with its lower greenhouse gas emissions and domestically based supply, provides a timely and cost effective bridge to nuclear power, the ultimate foreseeable environmentally responsible source.

It is obviously crucial to extract the correct lessons from the current Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant failures in Japan. But if global warming caused by human activity is to be a decisive factor, making nuclear work will be the only viable option.

William D. Sauerwein, Phoenix

Source:  The Baltimore Sun, www.baltimoresun.com 30 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.