[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind project is worse than the Northern Pass  

Credit:  By Jim Buttolf / For the Monitor, Concord Monitor, www.concordmonitor.com 28 March 2011 ~~

Jane Diffley recently wrote that the Northern Pass power lines and towers will “permanently alter the lands they cross, fragmenting forests, disrupting wildlife habitat, disfiguring communities and lowering property values” (Monitor Opinion Page, March 5).

This sounds like Groton Wind, except that with the wind farm, 24 turbines would be perched atop the ridgelines of the historic Baker River Valley, extending an additional 399 feet with gigantic spinning blades, making Northern Pass towers look like tinker toys!

Many are duped into believing Groton Wind will produce bountiful “green” energy. Baloney!

We’re talking about random surges totaling a measly 15-20 outrageously priced megawatts sold out of state, mostly generated during off-peak demand. (Northern Pass is 1,200 megawatts.) Carbon mitigation would be virtually imperceptible. The more we learn about the risks to peregrine falcons, eagles and bats (not to mention humans), the worse it gets.

This might sound like an opportunity for employment, but check the fine print. Perhaps locals might find temporary work cutting down trees, but shortly after the ridgelines have been dynamited and the rubble is removed, virtually everyone gets fired.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s decision is just days away. It’s outrageous to destroy the Baker River Valley so that Spanish Iberdrola can reap insane taxpayer-subsidized profits. E-mail the SEC at Jane.Murray@des.nh.gov referencing Groton Wind docket 2010-11.

(Jim Buttolph lives in Rumney.)

Source:  By Jim Buttolf / For the Monitor, Concord Monitor, www.concordmonitor.com 28 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.