[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bill would repeal green energy law  

Credit:  BY JOHN MURAWSKI - Staff writer, The News & Observer, www.newsobserver.com 25 March 2011 ~~

Barely three years have passed since the state overhauled its energy policy to require electric utilities to meet energy demand through renewable resources and energy efficiency programs.

Now a legislative proposal introduced Wednesday would scrap the 2007 energy law, known as Senate Bill 3. Republican state Rep. George Cleveland’s bill calls for the immediate repeal of the bill, which requires power companies to meet 12.5 percent of customer electricity demand through renewables and conservation by 2021.

Cleveland, a retired U.S. Marine who represents Onslow County, said he has been against SB3 since the beginning. “I didn’t like SB3 when they rammed it down our throats, and I don’t like it today,” he said. “It’s a bill to subsidize nonconventional energy at the expense of the taxpayer.”

The repeal of SB3 has been advocated by the conservative John Locke Foundation. The Raleigh nonprofit says SB3 artificially drives up electricity prices and panders to environmental extremists. “SB3 primarily serves as a way to mandate a guaranteed market for renewable energy providers, because otherwise people would avoid their cost-prohibitive and unreliable electricity,” the organization says on its website.

Utilities support law

Senate Bill 3 took months of negotiations among lawmakers, electric utilities, environmentalists, renewable industries and other constituencies, and is regarded by supporters as a major policy achievement.

Power companies, initially skeptical of alternative energy, are now committed to the legislation. “We do not support [repealing] it,” Progress Energy spokesman Mike Hughes said. “We’ve made some investments to be in compliance with SB3, and these investments are long-term.”

Specifically, Progress has signed a number of 20-year contracts to buy the power output from solar energy farms. Progress also has developed a program of financial incentives for customers who buy energy-efficient appliances.

Charlotte-based Duke Energy likewise opposes repealing SB3. “It has done a lot of good things for the state,” Duke spokesmanJason Walls said. “This legislation has really helped create a market for solar energy in the state.”

The law is also supported by N.C. Energy Policy Council, a panel that advises Gov. Bev Perdue and lawmakers onenergy issues.

“With wise and determined leadership, North Carolina’s green energy economy ambitions will eclipse sloganeering to create jobs, build stronger communities and lead the economic recovery,” the council said in a recent report.

The John Locke Foundation’s concerns about the bill include provisions that allow Progress, Duke, municipal power agencies and rural electric cooperatives to meet SB3 mandates by paying premiums to out-of-state wind farms without having to buy the electricity.

The foundation notes that wind energy in North Carolina is a nonstarter because of strong opposition to building 400-foot tall turbines along the coast and in the mountains.

The group says also that solar and wind energy are not only costly but unreliable, providing electricity only when it’s windy and sunny.

The cost of the renewable and efficiency programs is passed on to utility customers, as is the case for new nuclear plant development and all utility strategies to meet customer energy demand.

The bill has been sent to the House committee on public utilities.

Source:  BY JOHN MURAWSKI - Staff writer, The News & Observer, www.newsobserver.com 25 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.