[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbine opponents have their say  

Credit:  The Wareham Observer, www.thewarehamobserver.com 24 March 2011 ~~

Opponents of a proposal to place six 500-foot tall wind turbines on five separate cranberry bogs in Wareham took center stage Wednesday night during a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals.

Michael S. McCann of McCann Appraisal LLC flew in from Chicago to speak on behalf of critics on the proposal. He told a packed audience at the Town Hall Auditorium that research shows homes located within two miles of wind turbines loose 25 percent of their value.

“Industrial-style wind turbines change the essential character of the area,” he said, added that the town could lose up to $112 million of its market value based on the locations of the proposed turbines. He also noted the noise pollution often associated with turbines of that size.

“Nuisance issues drive people to sell at a discount,” he said.

According to Peter Guldberg, an independent consultant hired to perform a peer review for the town, said the noise pollution could reach as high as nine decibels near the homes closest to the turbines. He also took the proponents of the project – Beaufort Windpower LCC – to task for an alleged lack of research into ambient noise issues.

Company president Glen Berkowitz said his firm will do everything possible to lessen any negative impact the turbines may have on neighbors. He claimed that many of the concerns voiced by residents will not come to fruition because much of the research cited by opponents is based on much larger turbines.

McCann rejected that claim, saying “You can’t fit an elephant in a shower. That’s what they’re trying to do here.”

The “Bog Wind Power Cooperative Project” would, if approved, include four turbines off Charge Pond Road (on three separate bogs), one off Blackmore Pond Road, and another off Cranberry Highway in East Wareham.

Residents had other concerns beyond property values and noise pollution. Barry Cosgrove noted that the blades of the turbines would create a “strobe effect” on surrounding properties.

Berkowitz claimed the project would generate nearly $250,000 in tax revenue for the town annually, provide $100,000 in permit fees, and would help support cranberry growers by providing them with free electricity. Opponents say the amount of tax revenue is greatly exaggerated, in part because of the expected depreciation of equipment involved.

The hearing was continued to a later date.

Source:  The Wareham Observer, www.thewarehamobserver.com 24 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch