[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm plans for Staffordshire withdrawn  

Credit:  By Justin Halifax, Birmingham Post, www.birminghampost.net 17 March 2011 ~~

A firm which withdrew plans to build a controversial wind farm in Staffordshire should help to cover the £50,000-plus dent it left in the taxpayers’ purse, a county councillor has said.

Despite there being no legal ground to support the move, the payback call has been made by Lichfield’s Rural East county councillor Matthew Ellis.

It comes after German company Prowind withdrew its plans for four massive wind turbines at Hoggs Hill at Haunton, near Tamworth, just an hour before a Lichfield District Council planning meeting where the scheme was recommended for refusal.

About 900 residents in Haunton, Clifton Campville and Elford had objected to the original plan – which Prowind has now replaced with a smaller plan for two wind turbines at the same site.

It is estimated that the cost in man hours alone for council planning officers dealing with the original application is between £60,000 and £80,000.

Prowind paid £10,000 towards the council’s costs, which means the bill to the taxpayer is between £50,000 and £70,000, according to Coun Ellis.

Mr Ellis has accused the firm of “highly unpalatable” and costly tactics.

He said: “Clearly, the community’s strong message has been heard and the company’s tactic is to withdraw the application rather than risk any confirmation of refusal by the council’s planning committee.

“It now means the existing application, which has been ongoing for nearly 18 months, no longer exists.”

Coun Ellis added: “I find it highly unpalatable that the tactical approach of Prowind means so much council tax payers’ money – tens of thousands of pounds – has had to be spent by the district council for no reason. Whilst I understand there is no legal mechanism to do so, I am encouraging the district council to take a stand in these circumstances and invoice Prowind for all or some of the cost of administering this withdrawn application.”

Planning committee chairman Coun Richard Cox said: “There is no way for the council to seek further money from the applicant, if a planning application is withdrawn.”

He said Prowind paid a set planning application fee of £9,715, which will not be refunded.

Johannes Busmann, managing director of Prowind, said the company chose to withdraw its application after it was told the council was recommending the committee refuse the wind farm plans.

Source:  By Justin Halifax, Birmingham Post, www.birminghampost.net 17 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.