[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind-farms generate debate in Lauder  

Credit:  Border Telegraph, www.bordertelegraph.com 15 March 2011 ~~

The owner of one of Scotland’s oldest castles has warned wind-farms are destroying the Borders historic landscape.

Gerald Maitland-Carew, who runs Thirlestane Castle in Lauder, claimed more turbines were being built in the region than any other area of the country.

He believes they scarred the landscape and put tourists off visiting the Borders.

And, with plans for around 100 new turbines in the area, the Lord Lieutenant of Roxburgh, Ettrick and Lauderdale claimed “enough is enough”.

However, if approved, Lauderdale Community Council revealed the wind-farms could generate as much as £2.5million for the local community over the next 25 years and be used to protect local services currently under-threat from closure following public spending cuts, such as the library and leisure centre, as well as set up a new youth group in the area.

Speaking to the Border Telegraph at a public exhibition on the future of wind farms held in Lauder Public Hall on Wednesday, Captain Maitland-Carew, the Queen’s representative for the region, said: “We have got the most amazing landscape here that people from all over the world come to visit and I can’t help but think it is being destroyed.

“In Lauder, we appear to be getting more wind-farms than anywhere else in Scotland – we are surrounded by them and I am terribly against it.

“I can understand why so many landowners and developers are keen to construct them because of the huge amount of public subsidies involved and the money that can be generated.”

But he added: “These wind-farms are going to use more energy than they produce and people that live near them will suffer because, as well as destroying the landscape, they will affect the price of their property and impact on their health.”

Plans for five new wind-farms in and around Lauder – Girthgate, Crosbie Moor, Brunta Hill, Rowantree and Shaw Park – were put on display ahead of a wind-farm hustings to be held in the Royal Burgh before the Scottish Parliament elections in May.

And, between them, they propose building 75 new turbines in the area, in addition to the wind farm already in existence on Soutra Hill and the 48 turbines being constructed at nearby Fallago Rig.

“Scottish Borders Council has in the past said that we don’t want some of these wind farms that we are now surrounded with and the developers have appealed to the Scottish Government,” Captain Maitland-Carew said.

“They say there is huge benefit to climate change but it’s actually the opposite.

“No-one wants to come to the Borders to walk past these gigantic turbines – some of which are the height of the Eildon Hills – and I’m afraid it is doing nothing for tourism in the area.”

Alistair Smith, chairman of Lauderdale Community Council, which organised the information day, said it was important that local residents had their say on all future wind-farm developments in the area.

“We have got a display on wind-farms which shows the good points and the bad points and we are asking the public for their views,” he said.

“It’s important that the community has its say because we need to know what they want.” But he added: “The worry is only the objectors turn up to meetings and we don’t hear from the people who want to support them.”

A windfarm hustings planned to be held in Lauder on March 16, involving all political parties, has been postponed with a new date expected to be announced before the end of April.

Source:  Border Telegraph, www.bordertelegraph.com 15 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.