[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Calls to reject ‘overbearing’ windfarm bid  

Credit:  By Stephen Christie, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 16 March 2011 ~~

A windfarm earmarked for a Buchan peat field would be “dominant and overbearing”, planning chiefs have warned.

Aberdeenshire Council officials are urging members of the authority’s infrastructure services committee to throw out the proposal for St Fergus, near Peterhead.

The committee is expected to rule on the application for the three-turbine development when it meets this week.

Edinburgh-based Greenspan Agency is steering the project and hopes to build at St Fergus Moss, about six miles north of Peterhead.

In contrast to many other turbine schemes, it has attracted no objections and the council received 19 letters in support.

Supporters claim the turbines would be “visually attractive” and would benefit the community.

Buchan councillors initially went against planners’ recommendations and backed the proposal, before it was referred to the infrastructure committee.

They argued that because the Buchan landscape is dominated by large industrial structures – such as Peterhead Power Station and the St Fergus gas terminal – the three 330ft masts would fit in.

The planning service branded the development “large, overly dominant and overbearing”, however.

A spokesman said the overall impact would be unacceptable alongside other existing and planned turbines, and it would also set a precedent “in an area that is home to increased numbers of wind developments”.

He added: “The cumulative impact of the proposed development, as viewed along with other consented turbines in the area, would detrimentally change the character of the area.”

The infrastructure services committee is due to meet at Woodhill House, Aberdeen, tomorrow.

Source:  By Stephen Christie, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 16 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.