[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Berkeley Vale wind farm decision delayed again  

Credit:  By Claire Marshall, Gazette, www.gazetteseries.co.uk 9 March 2011 ~~

Councillors are concerned by the ‘avalanche’ of criticism they have received about the local authority’s planning department from campaigners fighting against a wind farm application.

The decision on the application for four wind turbines near Stinchcombe was deferred again this week, due to the absence of two senior planning officials from the meeting of the development control committee at Stroud District Council on Tuesday.

However at the meeting the members took the opportunity to point out that they had been bombarded with comments from local residents claiming that the officer’s report into the wind farm application was inadequate.

The councillors also said they felt they had been given insufficient evidence or facts – in a readable format – to help inform their decision.

Cllr Dennis Andrewartha, (Cam West), said: “I think every member is concerned by the avalanche of criticism of this report we are getting from residents in Stinchcombe and across the district “It is becoming intolerable for members to come to a decision with the findings that are placed before us in the report.”

He said he found some of the wind speed data to be like reading ‘gobbledegoop’ and that it needed changing into a digestible format.

Cllr Graham Trave, (Uley and Coaley), called for the report to be completely re-written and in particular to include more detail about current government policy on wind farms.

“I think there is now time for the whole officer report to be re-written.”

He said he believed they were leaving themselves ‘wide open’ to legal challenges without better facts.

He added: “We have a duty of care to get this decision right.”

Head of planning Phil Skill said the report would be re-written to incorporate all the areas of concern brought up by councillors, but large parts that were currently accurate would remain the same.

The application by green-energy firm Ecotricity is for four 120 metre high turbines on farmland Stinchcombe and the M5.

It is likely a decision will now be made at a meeting in April, however a date has not yet been set.

Source:  By Claire Marshall, Gazette, www.gazetteseries.co.uk 9 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.