LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Crunch meeting for wind turbine plans 

Credit:  By Ben Falconer, Chief Reporter, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 2 March 2011 ~~

Battle lines are drawn for a key meeting which could see permission granted for four huge wind turbines in the Berkeley Vale.

Stroud District Council planning officers have recommended Next Generation’s proposals for four 120 metre-high wind turbines at Stinchcombe are approved, which means the elected planning committee members have the chance to kick it out or give it the green light on Tuesday.

Next Generation sister firm Ecotricity floated the idea of eight turbines at the site almost 18 months ago, and since then pared it back to four.

The proposal sparked huge controversy, as the site is overlooked by the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, within which Ecotricity has one turbine at Nympsfield.

Dozens of objections from both sides have been sent to the council, and campaign group Save Berkeley Vale is hoping committee members will ignore their officers’ advice.

“We do hope very, very sincerely that they have been taking on board some of the many concerns that have been expressed,” said Pippa Leggate, a committee member of Save Berkeley Vale.

Consistency

“We don’t have a problem as such with green energy but in this context where the vale does not have the same consistent winds that you might find in an open area of water of rolling high moorland, there are issue of consistency which are related to the cost effectiveness and overall effectiveness.

“We are concerned about noise and the impact it will have on a beautiful region.

“There is a large body of concern that it is going to spoil an area without providing a benefit.”

The proposal was recommended for refusal at the last committee meeting in February because not enough information on potential noise impact was provided.

If it gets approval, Ecotricity is pledging to create a fund which could bring in £10 million for community facilities in its lifespan.

“With all the current talk of libraries, community centres and sports halls being closed because of government cuts, here’s a great way for local communities to replace that funding,” said Ecotricity boss Dale Vince. ”

Source:  By Ben Falconer, Chief Reporter, www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk 2 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky