[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Town Board mulls wind suggestions 

Credit:  By Matt McAllister, The Journal, www.ogd.com 1 March 2011 ~~

HAMMOND – With James E. Langtry joining fellow councilman, James C. Pitcher on the sidelines, the Hammond Town Board will need all three remaining board members to agree in order for action to be taken on any wind issue vote.

Mr. Langtry’s sister, Susan L. Dunham, and Mr. Pitcher have signed wind leases with Iberdrola Renewables Inc. Both board members are now recusing themselves from wind discussions, leaving Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram and councilmen, Dr. James R. Tague and Douglas E. Delosh, with the three remaining votes.

“Any action will require the remaining three board members to vote in the affirmative,” Mr. Bertram said.

The town board held its second special meeting Monday for the purpose of reviewing recommendations made by the wind committee on the currently under-moratorium town wind law. Neither Mr. Langtry or Mr. Pitcher were in attendance.

The 10-member wind committee, appointed by the town board last March, met about 30 times and recently presented its final recommendations to the board. Committee members, including Rudolph A. Schneider, chairman, Ronald R. Papke, Merritt V. Young, Donald A. Ceresoli Jr., Richard K. Champney, Michele W. McQueer, Dr. Stephen D. Sarfaty, Frederick A. Proven, Allan P. Newell, and Leonard D. Bickelhaupt, made suggestions on noise and sound standards, a complaint resolution plan, and also developed the Real Property Value Guarantee (RPVG) and Project Oversight Control Board concepts.

Mr. Schneider, Mr. Papke, and Mr. Newell are working on the final report, which is expected to be ready for the town board by its next meeting on March 14.

Town board members commended the wind committee on its work.

“I feel the wind advisory committee has worked,” Mr. Bertram said. “It did seem like it took a long time for them to get direction, but there was a huge amount of documentation assembled and the committee did not just take opinions people offered without documentation to back them up.

“One of the most important things I hoped to accomplish with the advisory committee was public input,” the supervisor continued, “and if someone did not get a chance to get their views known, it was their own fault.”

Dr. Tague agreed.

“I feel the wind committee was a good cross section of Hammond residents,” he said. “They had a lot of information to discern and gave the town board good feedback and direction.”

Mr. Bertram, Dr. Tague, and Mr. Delosh have begun reviewing the committee’s recommendations. In July, the current year-long moratorium expires, leaving the board about four months to tweak and tinker.

“Viability will be up to Iberdrola,” Mr. Bertram said. “I think we will have possible sites for industrial wind turbines, given things like good neighbor agreements and other items.

“Iberdrola has indicated a project which could contain 75 turbines, but there are other projects in the state with as few as 13, so I would surmise that some type of project would be viable, especially including Morristown and possibly Oswegatchie.”

Monday evening, the board discussed committee recommendations on noise and setbacks, the RPVG, and project management, taking no action except for a 3-0 vote to forward the RPVG along to town attorney, Mentor, Ruden & Trivilpiece, Syracuse.

Another special meeting is scheduled for March 28 at 7 p.m. in the town offices to continue the discussion.

Source:  By Matt McAllister, The Journal, www.ogd.com 1 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon