[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Prove benefits of wind power 

Credit:  Burlington Free Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 1 March 2011 ~~

The Feb. 18 editorial “Take a leap of faith and ride the wind” stated that, “Critics say (Shumlin) should turn his back largely because of the impact on aesthetics, the impact on wildlife and the degradation of the land.” There are more than just these three sound reasons to reject mammoth wind projects in Vermont.

The governor tells us that we must install wind to reduce CO2 on our grid in order to save the world from overheating due to CO2 presumably caused by burning fossil fuels to generate electricity. It has not been proven anywhere in the world that wind energy generation reduces useful amounts of CO2 emissions on modern grids.

Before moving forward on any engineering project, the assumptions and theory that underpin the project must be proven by actual tests in the project’s proposed location. This is called “due diligence.” It proves the project claims – or disproves them. Moving forward without performing this basic step is irresponsible to the extreme (and should be illegal).

This basic step has not been taken regarding wind power, especially in Vermont’s green mountains where turbulent winds further reduces turbine efficiencies and damage turbines adding more cost.

The editorial says, “But here we are in that position in the greenest state in the country, presented with a renewable energy project that will lead us, as envisioned, into a cleaner future.” Really? Prove it! Build a small test project or monitor Searsburg thoroughly and independently.

Source:  Burlington Free Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 1 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky