[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Assessors deny key permit to developer  

Credit:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 26 February 2011 ~~

PLEASANT RIDGE PLANTATION – Town offficials here slowed the permitting process for a commercial wind project developer Thursday night, to the surprise and approval of some residents.

The town’s three assessors voted unanimously to deny a permit to Highland Wind LLC, which wanted to string transmission wires over the southern portion of Rowe Pond Road.

The wires are an essential component of the 39-turbine project in neighboring Highland Plantation and would have crossed near four houses and a small park in Pleasant Ridge Plantation.

If the developer wishes to appeal the assessors’ decision, it may do so with the Somerset County commissioners. The permit is needed for state approval of the wind farm.

The elected assessors – echoing the sentiments of the town’s selectmen – denied the developer’s permit application to the town on the basis that it was inconsistent with a similar application filed with the state. The discrepancy in wire locations was discovered by resident Retta Giguere, who raised the issue at a public hearing Feb. 10.

The assessors also stated the lines would be unsightly and would cross too close to homes.

Though no turbines are planned for Pleasant Ridge, some residents would be able to see the turbines across town boundaries and have opposed the project.

About 15 people attended the hour-and-a-half meeting Thursday night in the community of about 80 residents. Pleasant Ridge is about 30 miles north of Skowhegan.

Highland Wind LLC is operated by Brunswick-based Independence Wind, which is led by former Gov. Angus King and former Maine Public Broadcasting Corp. president Rob Gardiner.

Erik Stumpfel, an attorney for Highland Wind from the firm Eaton Peabody, admitted the permit application filed with Pleasant Ridge deviates from the information filed with the Land Use Regulation Commission.

The town application states the transmission lines would pass alongside the existing Central Maine Power Company utility wires, but the state application shows the wires deviating from the existing CMP lines and traveling closer to people’s homes.

The difference in wire locations between the two applications is 577 feet.

“It is not and has never been adjacent to the CMP transmission corridor,” Stumpfel said.

However, the town application was “sufficient to let the public know approximately where this crossing would be,” he said. “We would suggest this is not misleading.”

Giguere disagreed, saying, “577 feet is quite a difference in my mind.” She told First Assessor Robert Bowden his duty was to the people of Pleasant Ridge, not the developer.

Bowden replied, “It still comes down in the end … to ‘does the application meet the requirements of the law?’”

Before the assessors closed the public hearing portion of the meeting, Giguere said, “You do realize this is going to ruin our beautiful little corner down there?”

The assessors ultimately agreed with her. “Over a tenth of a mile is quite a jump out of the way,” Charlie Rollins, third assessor, said during the board’s deliberations.

Bowden said there was a “radical” difference between the developer’s applications.

“(The area is) never going to look the same again,” said Marlene Merrill, second assessor.

The assessors did, however, approve permits for the remaining three high-wire road crossings – over Cross Road, Pleasant Ridge Road and the northern section of Rowe Pond Road – saying those applications met all legal requirements.

Norman St. Hilaire, an engineer from RLC Engineering who helped design the transmission lines, said he supported the board’s decision: “I think they tried to do the best job they can as a board, and I respect that.”

Giguere said she didn’t know what to expect from the assesors, but, “I’m pleased with it. I’m satisfied.”

Source:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 26 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch