[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Expert witnesses slam wind turbine reports 

Credit:  By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 15 February 2011 ~~

American-based expert witnesses for those opposed to a Thamesville-area wind farm levelled criticism at provincial reports on wind turbines during an Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal hearing in Chatham Tuesday.

The Kent Breeze Wind Farm project, owned by Suncor Energy, is being challenged by appellants Katie Erickson and Chatham-Kent Wind Action Inc. on the basis that noise from wind farms can cause harm to human health, including sleep disturbance, psychological stress, inner ear symptoms and headaches to those living near the structures.

New York resident, Dr. Arline Bronzaft, who gave testimony as an environmental psychologist, slammed the report titled Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects, an Expert Panel Review, prepared for the Canadian and American wind energy associations.

She said the report didn’t include a full range exploration of studies dealing with the impact of noise in human behaviour and performance.

“Annoyance is a very serious effect,” Bronzaft said, adding it indicates a person is being bothered and disturbed and there is an impact on the body creating stress.

She said when it comes to wind turbines, so little weight has been given to the quality of sound.

Sound and noise are two different things, she added.

“Sound is what we measure,” Bronzaft said. “Noise is how the human being interprets that sound.

“A dripping faucet may not measure that loud, but it sure can keep someone awake,” she added.

Andrea Huckins, lawyer for the Ministry of Environment, said if she agreed wind turbines can cause some harm, would Bronzaft agree the harm could be mitigated?

Bronzaft said she didn’t know.

“All I know is that people are complaining that it’s disruptive to their lives,” she said.

Dr. Carl Phillips, a Harvard graduate who is an expert in epidemiology, which involves the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events, was critical of a recent study released by Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, titled: The Potential Health Impacts of Wind Turbines.

Phillips called the study flawed because it barely touches on the huge collection of adverse events reported by people living near wind turbines.

He said adverse event reports, numbering much less than the number of reports surrounding wind turbines, are widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to address issues arising from drugs.

Phillips said adverse event reports “are the cornerstone for identifying emergent health issues.”

Albert Engel, lawyer for Suncor, asked Phillips if he has conducted a study of people living near the Kent Breeze Wind Farm to determine what the effects the project will have on their health.

Phillips responded: “I don’t think anybody knows how to do a study at this point to determine susceptibility (to harm by wind turbines).”

The hearing resumes Wednesday when the appellants are expected to call their final expert witness, Dr. Robert McMurtry, the former Dean of Medicine at the University of Western Ontario, who is currently serving as a board member of the Institute of Well-Being.

After Wednesday, the hearing is slated to resume in March with nine more days scheduled between Chatham and Toronto. The tribunal heard Wednesday that all the evidence is expected to be presented by March 31. However, all sides will need another two weeks to prepare their final submissions.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Ellwood Shreve, Chatham Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 15 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky