LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

A wind turbine on Melrose’s Mount Hood? 

Credit:  By Jim Haddadin/Wicked Local Melrose, Melrose Free Press, www.wickedlocal.com 11 February 2011 ~~

Could a wind turbine on Mount Hood generate enough electricity to power both Mount Hood Golf Course, and the city’s public schools? And if so, how much would it cost, how tall would it be, and who would pay for it?

The Melrose Park Commission took a step toward answering those questions on Monday night by approving an expenditure of up to $4,250, which will allow the city to go forward with a state-subsidized feasibility study into the viability of a wind energy project at Mount Hood.

The wind turbine study, which costs $50-85K, depending on the amount of electricity the turbine would generate, is paid for through the Commonwealth Wind Incentive Program, offered by the state-funded Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MTC).

The Melrose Energy Commission began pursuing a grant through the Wind Incentive program in 2009. The Park Commission was told in 2006 that there was not enough wind at Mount Hood to qualify for a similar grant program offered by the state, based on the available wind technology at that time. Improvements in wind turbine technology since then may provide a viable path to generating wind energy near the 11th and 18th holes of the Mount Hood Golf Course, however.

In order to the qualify for the Wind Incentive program, the city was first required to undergo a study by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to determine whether a wind turbine would interfere with radio communications from nearby airports. After a three-month delay, the FAA recently completed the study, concluding a turbine would pose no interference with aviation equipment. The Energy Commission is also filing for a revised assessment from the FAA to evaluate the effects of an even taller turbine.

The Wind Incentive program requires cities and towns to contribute 5 percent of the cost of a feasibility study. At most, this would obligate the Park Commission to pay $4,250 for the study.

The study would look at seven issues, including siting; wind resources and energy production; appropriate technology; electrical infrastructure requirements; environmental and permitting issues; community impact; and project economics.

“As you go up in size and power, you go up in height of the turbine as well,” explained David Shakespeare, chairman of the energy commission.

The city would have three funding options to construct a wind turbine at Mount Hood: taking out a bond to be paid back in its entirety, in which case the city would own the turbine; leasing the land to a private company that would construct the turbine and sell the energy to the city at a discounted rate; or by securing funding from energy-efficiency grants.

Based on a preliminary study of the wind energy project, a small turbine – one that would generate about 100 kW – would be powerful enough to supply energy for Mount Hood Golf Course, and possibly the Beebe School, located on West Foster Street, currently occupied by the Anova School. A larger 900 kW tower – a size that might be used in a small wind farm – would generate enough power to supply all of the schools in the city, except the two largest, Melrose High School and the Melrose Veterans Memorial Middle School, Shakespeare told the Park Commission during a presentation on Monday night, Feb. 7.

Source:  By Jim Haddadin/Wicked Local Melrose, Melrose Free Press, www.wickedlocal.com 11 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky