[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Agency proposes new regulations for wind energy; Critics say rules fly in the face of bird concerns 

Credit:  Associated Press, www.columbiatribune.com 9 February 2011 ~~

The Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing voluntary guidelines for onshore wind energy developers to avoid bird deaths and other harm to wildlife as part of the Obama administration’s big push for renewable and clean energy.

Bird advocates who had lobbied for mandatory standards warned that the new guidelines would do nothing to stem bird deaths as wind power builds up across the country.

“We have a responsibility to ensure that solar, wind and geothermal projects are built in the right way and in the right places so they protect our natural and cultural resources and balance the needs of our wildlife,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said yesterday. President Barack Obama has called for the nation to get 80 percent of its electricity from clean energy sources by 2035, and renewable sources are expected to play a key role in that effort.

The department is seeking public comment for its proposed guidelines ahead of a two-day renewable energy conference in Washington. The agency also is proposing new voluntary guidance aimed at preventing deaths of bald and golden eagles.

The American Bird Conservancy said the wind industry’s goal of providing 20 percent of the nation’s electricity by 2030 would lead to a million bird deaths a year or more.

The group took out print and online advertisements in political publications this week featuring a cartoon bird saying, “Help me get home alive” and asking people to sign a petition calling for mandatory standards.

“Let’s not fast-track wind energy at the expense of America’s birds,” said Mike Parr, a vice president with the group. “Just a few small changes need to be made to make wind bird-smart, but without these, wind power simply can’t be considered a green technology,” he said.

John Anderson, director of siting policy at the American Wind Energy Association, said every form of energy, communication and transportation has an affect on wildlife.

“We really feel that based on post-construction data that’s collected, that there is not a significant impact, and it is far exceeded by other sources of energy production and communication towers,” he said. “Why are we being held to a different standard?”

Anderson said the wind industry has a long history of collaborating with conservation groups to find ways to reduce bird deaths and noted that wind energy displaces emissions of carbon dioxide blamed for global warming, which has been identified as a big threat to wildlife, including birds.

A 2005 USDA Forest Service report estimated that 500 million to possibly more than 1 billion birds are killed in the United States every year in collisions with manmade structures such as vehicles, buildings, power lines, telecommunication towers and wind turbines.

The report estimated that 550 million are killed by buildings and 130 million by power lines, while only 28,000 are killed by wind turbines. A 2009 report by Fish and Wildlife scientist put the figure at 440,000 annual bird deaths by wind turbines.

Despite those lower numbers, the bird group argues that the wind industry is in a unique position because it’s at the beginning of a nationwide build-out and can still take steps to minimize bird impacts before that occurs.

Last year, a second “State of the Birds” report from the Department of the Interior found that global climate change poses a significant threat to migratory bird populations.

The previous year, the first such report, also released by the Interior Department secretary, found that energy production of all types – such as wind, ethanol and mountaintop coal mining – was contributing to steep drops in bird populations.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  Associated Press, www.columbiatribune.com 9 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky