[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Judge orders wind opponents to disclose addresses  

Credit:  By: Danielle Nordine, The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 6 February 2011 ~~

A judge has ordered wind opponents to submit their addresses to Goodhue Wind despite arguments that the request was a form of “intimidation.”

Administrative Law Judge Kathleen Sheehy issued an order Friday requiring all members of Goodhue Wind Truth and the Coalition for Sensible Siting to give Goodhue Wind’s attorneys their home addresses and a list of any land “in the project area and buffer area…owned or rented, either directly or through a trust or business entity” by members.

The information must be submitted to the company by Feb. 11.

The order came after Goodhue Wind made the request in early January, followed by protective orders filed by Goodhue Wind Truth and the Coalition for Sensible Siting toward the end of the month.

Carol Overland, attorney for Goodhue Wind Truth, said the request was an attempt to intimidate members and did not fall into the narrow scope of the case.

Chuck Burdick of Goodhue Wind, however, said the information would help the company determine a better layout for the project site since the opponents would likely not allow the project on their land.

Sheehy wrote in the order that since the organizations are actively involved in the case, “it is not improper to require their members to disclose property ownership or interest within the project or buffer areas.”

The company originally had requested the names of members as well, but retracted that request when its lawyers filed a Motion to Compel asking the protective order be denied.

The motions come in the contested case currently before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. The goal of the case is to determine whether a Goodhue County ordinance requiring a roughly half-mile setback for wind turbines is on par with other state laws, and whether it should be applied to Goodhue Wind’s project. Hearings are scheduled for March 15-17 before Sheehy.

Source:  By: Danielle Nordine, The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 6 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter