[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kilmartin drops appeal over proposed offshore wind farm 

Credit:  By Alex Kuffner, Journal Staff Writer, The Providence Journal, www.projo.com 5 February 2011 ~~

PROVIDENCE – Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin has dropped the petition filed by his predecessor that asked the state Supreme Court to overturn a key approval for a wind farm planned in waters off Block Island.

The move, which has been expected for months, does not end the case. Three other parties also appealed the decision in August by the state Public Utilities Commission to approve a power-purchase agreement between developer Deepwater Wind and National Grid, Rhode Island’s dominant electric utility.

In a brief memorandum filed with the court on Friday, Kilmartin said he “does not desire to pursue this matter or maintain this Petition.” His office could not be reached for further comment. Deepwater declined comment.

As a state representative, last year, Kilmartin voted for legislation Deepwater needed after the PUC turned down its first long-term contract with National Grid.

And during his campaign for office, he voiced support for Deepwater’s plans, which include building a demonstration wind farm with five to eight turbines within three miles of Block Island and following that with a project of up to 200 turbines farther northeast. He said at the time that the project is part of “a long-term solution to energy costs and the rise in gas and fuel costs.”

The day after winning election in November, Kilmartin said he would end the appeal filed by then-Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch.

Lynch’s office was joined in the case by the Conservation Law Foundation, a regional environmental advocacy group, and two manufacturers with facilities in Rhode Island, Polytop Corp. and Toray Plastics.

Lynch’s office, as well as Polytop and Toray, objected to the high price of offshore wind power in the contract. Although the Conservation Law Foundation supports renewable energy, it filed an appeal because it opposed the statute that allowed National Grid and Deepwater to negotiate a deal, saying it amounted to special-interest legislation.

The three remaining petitioners are continuing with the case and filed briefs earlier this week. A hearing date has not been set.

Source:  By Alex Kuffner, Journal Staff Writer, The Providence Journal, www.projo.com 5 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky