[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planning Board OKs winery windmill 

Credit:  By Thomas J. Prohaska, NEWS NIAGARA REPORTER, The Buffalo News, www.buffalonews.com 3 February 2011 ~~

CAMBRIA – The Town Planning Board has reversed itself on a wind power project at Arrowhead Spring Vineyards, scrubbing its previous rejection of the proposal and approving it instead.

The change may have been the result of a lawsuit filed against the town by the winery owners, as well as a phone call to the state Department of Agriculture and Markets.

An agreement canceling the lawsuit, which was to have been heard next Thursday in State Supreme Court, referred to the Planning Board’s “incorrect interpretation” of a provision of the town’s wind power ordinance, passed in 2009.

The provision in question was a line requiring the electricity generated by an approved windmill to be used solely for agricultural use.

If so, a windmill project would require only site-plan review by the Planning Board. Otherwise, it would need a stricter special use permit, requiring a public hearing.

When the Planning Board voted down the Arrowhead proposal Nov. 29, it believed it had been misled by Duncan and Robin Ross, owners of the winery off Cambria-Lockport Town Line Road.

They told the board that the power was to be used for winery operations only, but further discussion showed the power also would go to the Ross home, which is on the same parcel.

Town Building Inspector Clifford

E. Burch said that shouldn’t have ruled out the Arrowhead proposal.

A check with Ag and Markets showed the state doesn’t interpret its own wind power regulations as requiring separate electric services for residences and farm operations.

“Most farmers have their offices in their houses,” Burch said.

“The interpretation shouldn’t have been so narrow,” said Planning Board attorney Gary Billingsley.

“It’s a farm operation. They’re using one [electric] meter,” said the Rosses’ attorney, Charles W. Malcomb of Buffalo’s Hodgson Russ law firm.

The project approved by the Planning Board last week was the same as the one it had rejected two months before: a 10-kilowatt windmill 132 feet high, measuring from the ground to the tip of the windmill blades in their highest position.

It was uncertain when construction would begin.

Source:  By Thomas J. Prohaska, NEWS NIAGARA REPORTER, The Buffalo News, www.buffalonews.com 3 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky