[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

N. Kingstown seeking turbine moratorium  

Credit:  By Alex Kuffner and Andy Smith, Journal Staff Writers, The Providence Journal, www.projo.com 3 February 2011 ~~

NORTH KINGSTOWN – The town is asking the General Assembly to impose a one-year moratorium on land-based wind turbines throughout Rhode Island so that statewide siting guidelines can be developed.

On Jan. 10, the Town Council passed a six-month moratorium on new wind turbines to allow time for North Kingstown to create a new wind-energy ordinance. The move came after two proposals for large turbines stirred vigorous opposition in town.

Town Manager Michael Embury said local officials were meeting to discuss the ordinance when they decided it made more sense to wait for the state to complete an effort to create uniform standards for wind turbines.

Partly, Embury said, it’s an issue of statewide consistency; partly, it’s a question of money for towns struggling with tight budgets.

“Each local community should not have to bear the very large expense of hiring consultants, establishing scientific and/or non-scientific parameters, which can be more easily addressed by the state,” said a news release from the town.

But imposing a statewide moratorium would harm the clean-energy industry in Rhode Island, said David Cohen, regional director of wind business for Alteris Renewables, a company active in the Northeast.

“You can’t just stop the industry without fully assessing the situation,” said Cohen.

Questions have been raised about standards for wind turbines elsewhere. In Massachusetts, a bill was proposed last year that would limit local control of how turbines are sited, but the legislation died. In Connecticut, a state council was handed authority over nearly all proposals, but some groups are chafing at the loss of local control.

The state Division of Planning has been working on standards that would relate to noise, fall zones, height and other issues. Kevin Flynn, associate director of the division, is supervising the project and expects it to be completed this summer. Individual cities and towns could then choose whether to adopt the standards.

“They would not be imposed on anyone,” he said.

Five wind turbines have been installed in Rhode Island – two in Portsmouth, one in Middletown and two in Warwick. The most recent, at the Shalom Housing apartment complex in Warwick, was completed Tuesday.

At least three dozen more are in various stages of planning. A group of East Bay communities is proposing to put up as many as 10 turbines in Tiverton with a total capacity of 25 megawatts. Naval Station Newport just embarked on a study to develop up to 9 megawatts of wind energy, which would require several turbines in Newport or Middletown. There are also proposals in Providence, Narragansett, Jamestown, Charlestown, Johnston and North Smithfield.

Although objectors have out come against some proposals, citing noise concerns and damage to views, the opposition has been more strident in Charlestown, North Kingstown and Johnston. The turbines being considered in those places are much larger than projects that have been developed elsewhere.

The largest turbine in the state, at Portsmouth High School, stands 336 feet tall at its highest point. The maximum height of the turbine at Shalom Housing is 156 feet.

In Charlestown, Whalerock Renewable Energy is proposing two turbines that would each be 410 feet high. Wind Energy Development wants to build one 389-foot tall turbine in North Kingstown and one that is 427 feet high. In Johnston, the company would put up a pair standing 496 feet.

David Darlington, spokesman for Wind Energy Development, said state guidelines could be helpful to a developer if they are fair, and towns are willing to abide by them.

“Rules done right are great for developers because they know what the rules are,” he said.

State Sen. V. Susan Sosnowski, chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Agriculture, said she would consider legislation to regulate wind turbines, but not a moratorium.

“There’s a lot we can do without just shutting the gate,” said Sosnowski, D-South Kingstown.

Rep. Deborah Ruggiero, chairwoman of the legislature’s Small Business Renewable Energy Task Force, agreed and said a moratorium would be bad for business.

Rep. Laurence Ehrhardt, R-North Kingstown, also a member of the task force, opposes the proposed North Kingstown turbines and said he’s a strong proponent of state guidelines. He said it’s too soon to determine whether a statewide moratorium is a good idea and has not talked to other legislators about it.

Cohen, of Alteris, said it would be easier for his company to navigate one set of rules in Rhode Island than many municipal ordinances. But at a time when state regulators are reassessing how turbine owners sell electricity to the power grid, a moratorium would be particularly damaging.

“I think everyone needs to slow down and look at particular projects and their suitability,” Cohen said. “Turbines are not appropriate everywhere. But the smaller machines are less imposing.”

The wind turbine at Shalom Housing, which Alteris installed, is one of the smaller ones. The Northwind machine is considered a community-scale turbine as opposed to utility-scale turbines that can be three times the size.

It was funded through a $1.4-million federal grant that also paid for other green initiatives at the nonprofit complex of 154 apartments for the elderly and disabled near Route 95. The turbine will save an estimated $25,000 a year in energy bills.

Bonnie Sekeres, executive director of Shalom, said the Warwick City Council unanimously supported installation of the turbine. At two public hearings before the council, no opponents stepped forward, she said.

On Tuesday, when a crane lifted the blades into place, putting the final touch on the turbine, tenants watching from nearby apartments left no doubt about their opinion of the new machine.

“When the blades went up, they all cheered,” Sekeres said.

WIND TURBINES IN RI Proposals that received state or federal funding since 2009

East Bay Energy Consortium, Tiverton, 8-10 turbines

Hodges Badge Company, Portsmouth, one turbine

Sandywoods Farm, Tiverton, one turbine

Genesis Health Care, Middletown, one turbine

St. Antoine Residence, North Smithfield, one turbine

Coastal Housing Corporation, Portsmouth, one turbine

SLA Realty, Exeter, undetermined number of turbines

Narragansett Bay Commission, Providence, three turbines

Department of Environmental Management, Narragansett, one turbine

Turnpike and Bridge Authority, Jamestown, one turbine

City of Providence, up to two turbines

Town of New Shoreham, one turbine

Town of Jamestown, one turbine

Town of Narragansett, up to two turbines

North Kingstown School Department, one turbine

Town of North Smithfield, undetermined number of turbines

City of Warwick, undetermined number of turbines

Source:  By Alex Kuffner and Andy Smith, Journal Staff Writers, The Providence Journal, www.projo.com 3 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter