[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Landowners could face turbine clean-up bill 

Credit:  G. Travis, The Sun Times, 3 February 2011 ~~

With regards to the recent article cautioning farmers on the pitfalls of signing land leases for industrial wind turbines, I would share a further warning conveyed by our lawyer, when my wife and I were initially looking to purchase land in Prince Edward County two years ago, prior to ultimately deciding on a property near Chesley.

At the time, we were advised that most wind turbine leases do not provide guarantees that at the end of the contract, the wind company would actually be forced to remove decommissioned wind turbines and remediate the farmer’s land. Further there was a risk that if the wind company went bankrupt the farmer would likely bear the costs of removal which, to remove both the turbine and its foundation to return the site to arable farm land, could cost half a million to a million dollars.

Interestingly, since, I have read various reports where wind company representatives have provided “assurances” that concerns over abandoned or derelict industrial wind turbines are not warranted. A quick literature review however, suggests otherwise. Numerous abandoned industrial wind turbine installations now exist in the United States where industrial wind turbines have outlived their estimated 15-to 20-year operational life. Indeed, the number of abandoned industrial turbines in California is by some accounts estimated to exceed more than 10,000. In what is likely a harbinger of things to come to Ontario, the City of Palm Springs, Calif. has enacted an ordinance mandating that wind turbines be maintained in an operational state. Ultimately, where the wind turbine company is unable or unwilling to comply, the City looks to the landowner for enforcement.

Sadly, in the absence of a posted bond, Ontario farmers who sign wind turbine leases – and perhaps ultimately the municipality and taxpayer – could be looking at a clean-up bill in the next 15 to 20 years which not only exceeds the total compensation received from the wind company, but also the full value of the farm.

Source:  G. Travis, The Sun Times, 3 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky