[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbine variance voided 

Credit:  By WILLIAM LANEY, Managing Editor, Wapakoneta Daily News, www.wapakdailynews.com 1 February 2011 ~~

A variance approved by a city board in December to a downtown Wapakoneta business owner to construct a 100-foot wind turbine tower has been voided and will not be granted at this time. Wapakoneta City Zoning Board of Appeals President Dale Thomas announced the minutes from the Dec. 27 meeting, including the granting of a 51-foot variance, were voided because of an issue with the notification process. Richard and John McCormick of JMC Mechanical sought a 51-foot variance for a 100-foot wind turbine tower.
“The notification process states the city has to notify people within 250 feet from the site, which is a new change as a result of the city comprehensive plan, while city employees used the old ordinance which says the city must notify adjoining property owners,” Thomas told the Wapakoneta Daily News after Monday’s meeting. “We just made a mistake.”
McCormick’s application for a variance is still valid, but the notification process must start over. There was no wrongdoing by the McCormicks during the variance request process.
During Monday’s meeting where minutes from the Dec. 27 meeting were voided, Thomas announced the McCormicks intend to hold a public meeting regarding their plans.
McCormick, who is working with consultants with One Energy, of Marshall, Minn., intends to construct a 100-foot tall
wind turbine tower with 20-foot blades, which would generate 20 kilowatts of power. He said it could produce 50 decibels of sound at a distance of 50 feet while operating at maximum speed.
The wind turbine is expected to start producing energy with 3 mph winds and would lock down at high wind speeds. The tower is capable of turning toward the wind to maximize electric power output.
McCormick said One Energy worked with Upper Scioto Valley Schools on construction of their wind tubines and he noted the manufacturer will maintain the tower for the first five years, McCormick said.
Wapakoneta City Council Chambers attracted approximately 20 people, many who were opposed to the tower’s possible construction.
One group is the Downtown Wapakoneta Partnership, which was represented by past President Deb Zwez, who was involved in writing the city’s comprehensive plan.
“No. 1 we think it violates the spirit of the comprehensive plan that says downtown Wapakoneta should be the heart of the community,” Zwez said. “We believe downtown Wapakoneta’s success is going to be based on mixed uses such as retail, service and residential and in no way does the placement of a wind turbine downtown invite people into the downtown area.”
She said they also object on the basis of noise and flicker issues as well as issues with the fall zone, which would include the CSX railroad tracks.
“While we, as a group, are proponents of wind energy, we would certainly support efforts to place wind turbines in an area where it wouldn’t be such a distraction to citizens,” Zwez said. “We really don’t think that a wind turbine’s place is in downtown.”
The former Wapakoneta City Council member said members of the group intend to address councilors in the future to have their position read into the record. They would support councilors move forward and enact ordinances which would help fulfill the comprehensive plan and for councilors to approve a moratorium until such ordinances could be written.
Mayor Rodney Metz, who attended the meeting, intends to address councilors on the matter during Monday’s Wapakoneta City Council meeting and agreed with Thomas that a moratorium is an option.
“I will request city council to look at all aspects of alternative energy, whether it is wind turbines or solar panels, in regards to safety, appropriate locations and how to deal with the energy it generates,” Metz said. “Currently, we have no way to deal with a business that generates more electricity than it uses.”
If new ordinances were crafted, Metz said city council would likely hold hearings on the changes.

Source:  By WILLIAM LANEY, Managing Editor, Wapakoneta Daily News, www.wapakdailynews.com 1 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon