[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind’s legal storm may blow here 

Credit:  By Jim Algie, The Sun Times, www.owensoundsuntimes.com 28 January 2011 ~~

The lawyers have just started working on wind turbine cases in Ontario and some of the legal storms will blow up right here in Grey and Bruce counties, one leading specialist says.

Wind-related litigation is “a very active area of the law, lawyer Eric Gillespie said in an interview from his Toronto office Thursday.

He heads the Ontario Bar Association’s environmental program committee and organizes conferences for lawyers on the subject. He’s also spearheading two ground-breaking wind-power cases – one before a panel of judges and another before a provincial Environmental Review Panel.

Locally, Arran-Elderslie has sought to regulate wind turbine development with a controversial bylaw passed last spring. The move has raised strong support and objections on both sides of the debate.

Arran-Elderslie Deputy Mayor Mark Davis said Friday he’s aware of more than 50 municipalities that have adopted or endorsed his township’s Bylaw 14/10. Gillespie, whose office “is in touch with individuals and community groups right across Ontario,” described Arran-Elderslie as one place to watch for the future of wind power litigation.

“The future of the bylaw will be very interesting to follow,” Gillespie said. It “reflects the concern that municipal councils have about their lack of involvement in the current process.”

The province’s Green Energy Act streamlined wind power approvals, but stripped planning control from municipalities.

Whether Arran-Elderslie’s bylaw will survive a challenge from wind developers remains “an open question” in Gillespie’s view. Unlike circumstances elsewhere that force objectors to act, the Arran-Elderslie law will force proponents to start legal actions. That has yet to happen, although Davis figures it’s just a matter of time considering the number of proposals under discussion locally.

The bylaw requires wind power proponents to obtain certification from Health Canada and several provincial agencies that the development will “benefit and not harm the health, safety and well-being” of residents.

Arran-Elderslie also has concerns about whether it can provide adequate fire and emergency services for large wind turbine structures, Davis said. The municipality doesn’t have equipment to conduct a high angle rescue such as might be needed for an injured worker high up in a turbine structure, he said.

“We’d need to see how they’re going to deal with that to our satisfaction,” Davis said. “The onus is on us to make sure that is provided.”

There are other legal questions as well.

In Ontario Divisional Court Monday, a panel of three judges agreed to consider Gillespie’s objections to Green Energy Act regulations about residential setbacks from wind turbines on behalf of Ian Hanna of Prince Edward County.

In a separate Chatham-area case before the province’s Environmental Review Tribunal, to begin Tuesday, Gillespie will argue the first appeal of a renewable energy approval for a wind development, which was proposed by Suncor Inc. The hearing is expected to wrap up in late March.

The challenge is to prove harm and damages.

Gillespie expects the Suncor hearing to deal with the question of potential harm turbines could do to human health. The list of witnesses includes 23 experts on that heavily debated question.

The Chatham case will not consider the impact from wind development on neighbouring property values, however, because the Environmental Protection Act limits the scope of such reviews. The tribunal may consider only issues of “serious harm to human health” and “irreversible harm to . . . the natural environment,” Gillespie said.

Regarding property values, however, it’s only a matter of time before judges are asked to adjudicate. And there are few decided cases to guide future litigation.

“This is still very much an emerging area of the law,” Gillespie said. “The issue will be proof of liability and, if liability is shown, how to calculate damages.”

Industrial-scale wind power installations have been around for 20 years in some jurisdictions, but in Ontario wind farms have been smaller or more remote until recently.

“We haven’t had the opportunity to do a lot of scientific research around the large-scale, very large-sized turbines that are generally the type most projects are installing,” Gillespie said.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Jim Algie, The Sun Times, www.owensoundsuntimes.com 28 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon