| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Ethics Group’s petition denied
Credit: By BRIAN KELLY, TIMES STAFF WRITER, SATURDAY, JANUARY 29, 2011, watertowndailytimes.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A state Supreme Court judge has ruled that the town of Cape Vincent Planning Board “fully complied” with requirements of an environmental review for the 51-turbine St. Lawrence Wind Farm project and has dismissed a legal action opposing its acceptance.
Wind Power Ethics Group filed a petition in October asking that a judge rule that the board violated the state Environmental Quality Review Act and conflict-of-interest laws by approving a final environmental impact statement for the project in September.
The group wanted the approval nullified, claiming, among other things, that the board failed to take the requisite “hard look” at the project’s environmental impact and that board members who could benefit from the project’s construction, or have family who could, should have recused themselves from voting on the matter.
In a decision dismissing the challenge filed Thursday at the Jefferson County clerk’s office, Judge Hugh A. Gilbert wrote that voluminous records, accompanied by “persuasive and factual” legal arguments, “establishes to this Court that the requisite environmental SEQRA review was undertaken and completed.”
The judge noted that the board accepted the review by a 3-0 vote, with two abstentions. He said the abstentions “negate any potential” of conflicts of interest on the board’s part.
He also wrote that the board raised “a significant and fatal issue” regarding the group’s standing to bring the action. He said the group was the only petitioner in the proceeding, with no individual members named or joined in the action.
Judge Gilbert wrote that the group needed to establish that at least one of its members had standing to sue or that the group “is representative of the organizational purpose it asserts and that the case would not require the participation of individual members.”
“Whether Wind Power Ethics Group is an unincorporated or a limited liability company, as it now claims, we must concur with the (Planning Board) that it failed to prove that it had standing to pursue the claims made herein,” he wrote.
Wind Power Ethics Group President John L. Byrne said Friday evening that he had not seen the judge’s decision, but that he was not surprised by it and the group was prepared for it.
“We’re definitely going to appeal,” he said.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=45742 ]
