LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

High price of wind 

Credit:  Bangor Daily News, .bangordailynews.com 27 January 2011 ~~

The Western Maine mountains are a world-class tourist destination.

Recently, Outside Magazine listed Western Maine as the top winter weekend getaway. What happens to our reputation as Vacationland if we line them with 400-foot-tall wind turbines?

Many respondents in multiple economic studies have stated they are unwilling to visit an area if an industrial wind park is built. A research report prepared in June 2010 supports these findings.

Hikers on Bald Mountain in Woodstock were asked how their enjoyment would be affected if a wind park was close by. One hiker responded he would hike elsewhere, and an-other would rate her positive experience as zero.

As unappealing as it may be to vacation next to a wind park, dozens of Maine families now have to live beside them. Energy companies are refusing to learn from mistakes made in Mars Hill, Vinalhaven and Freedom. In Woodstock, Patriot Renewables hopes to construct a development a meager 2,200 feet from a residential structure and wants to be much closer at property lines. Realiz-ing noise compliance issues, the Maine DEP has asked Patriot to run in Reduced Noise Operations at night. Evidently, sleeping during the day or sell-ing properties at market value should no longer be an option for residents there.

After exploring the potential losses of nature-based tourism and the likely loss of property values, the clear conclusion is that Maine is paying too high a price for mountaintop industrial wind developments.

Denise Hall

Woodstock

Source:  Bangor Daily News, .bangordailynews.com 27 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky