[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lawmakers vow renewed push for wind energy siting bill 

Credit:  By Matt Murphy / State House News Service, www.bostonherald.com 18 January 2011 ~~

As environmental advocates rolled out their legislative agenda at multiple events Tuesday, Rep. Frank Smizik and Sen. Jamie Eldridge promised a revival of the wind energy siting bill that died at the end of the last session and put forth new legislation to create a new Office of Clean Technology to foster job growth in that sector.

Smizik and Eldridge are co-sponsoring a bill to create the new state office within the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development designed to encourage and foster growth in clean technology and help companies develop and manufacture products.

The legislation sets a goal of increasing clean tech jobs, businesses and research by 25 percent over the next 10 years. “It’s a bill for businesses to really create training and jobs and helping businesses develop products that can be sold around the world,” Smizik said.

Eldridge said he was cognizant that adding a new government entity as the state climbs out of the recession will be a consideration, but added: “With just the right amount of investment, the potential for jobs is immense.”

Both lawmakers also promised a return of the wind energy siting bill that died last session, despite majority support in both branches, because legislative leaders were unable to pass it before the end of formal sessions July 31.

Bill supporters say the legislation will streamline the wind energy approval process, boosting the so-called clean energy sector while protecting local decision-making powers. Critics say the initiative will erode local control and gives the industry unwarranted special consideration.

The House enacted the wind-siting bill in the waning hours of formal session July 31, but the Senate received the bill just after midnight. Senate President Therese Murray led a months-long effort to secure the bill’s final enactment, but Republican senators repeatedly stood in the bill’s path during sessions where objections from a single lawmaker can halt any bill.

“The House passed it and we think we can pass it again. We’re going to file it again with some very minor changes and we’re going to fight for it,” Smizik said.

Eldridge said he believes the Senate also has the votes to pass the bill.

Among the other environmental initiatives on the table for the coming session will be many familiar issues and some new ones.

Rep. Lori Ehrlich plans to file two pieces of legislation that she said may get packaged into an omnibus bill phasing out coal-burning in Massachusetts and placing a moratorium on the construction of new coal burning facilities and coal-gasification plants.

Sen. Cynthia Creem intends to file an updated bottle bill that would expand the deposit law to cover sports drinks, bottled water, and iced teas.

Creem and Rep. Kulik also plan to file a bill that would update the state’s Community Preservation Act in an attempt to make it more attractive to cities. The changes would allow cities to use the CPA to rehabilitate existing recreational fields and facilities rather than just build new ones, would allow communities to use other sources of revenue in addition to a surcharge on the property tax to fund open land preservation, and the bill would set a minimum state match at 75 percent, requiring an increase in Registry of Deeds surcharges currently used to fund the state share.

Source:  By Matt Murphy / State House News Service, www.bostonherald.com 18 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon